Proactive interference of a sequence of tones in a two-tone pitch comparison task

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 327-331

  Ruusuvirta, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MUSIC; PROACTIVE INHIBITION;

EID: 0034199411     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212989     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. BADDELEY, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
2. BADDELEY, A. D., & HITCH, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
3. COWAN, N., SAULTS, J. S., & NUGENT, L. D. (1997). The role of absolute and relative amounts of time in forgetting within immediate memory: The case of tone-pitch comparisons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 393-397.
4. DEUTSCH, D. (1975a). Facilitation by repetition in recognition memory for tonal pitch. Memory & Cognition, 3, 263-266.
5. DEUTSCH, D. (1975b). The organization of short-term memory for a single acoustic attribute. In D. Deutsch & J. A. Deutsch (Eds.), Short-term memory (pp. 107-151). New York: Academic Press.
6. DEUTSCH, D. (1984). Memory for nonverbal auditory information: A link between behavioral and physiological studies. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 45-54). New York: Guilford.
7. NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 201-288.
8. PAAVILAINEN, P., JIANG, D., LAVIKAINEN, J., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1993). Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 35, 139-152.
9. PECHMANN, T., & MOHR, G. (1992). Interference in memory for tonal pitch: Implications for a working-memory model. Memory & Cognition, 20, 314-320.
10. REMIJN, G. B., & SUGITA, Y. (1996). Mismatch between anticipated and actually presented sound stimuli in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 202, 169-172
11. Ross, J., TERVANIEMI, M., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms of the octave illusion: Electrophysiological evidence for central origin. NeuroReport. 8, 303-306.
12. SAARINEN, J., PAAVILAINEN, P., SCHRÖGER, E., TERVANIEMI, M., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1992). Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. NeuroReport, 3, 1149-1151.
13. SEMAL, C., DEMANY, L., UEDA, K., & HALLÉ, P.-A. (1996). Speech versus nonspeech in pitch memory. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1132-1140.
14. SOKOLOV, E. N. (1975). The neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex. In E. N. Sokolov & O. S. Vinogradova (Eds.). Neuronal mechanisms of the orienting reflex (pp. 217-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. TERVANIEMI, M, MAURY, S., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1994). Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 5, 844-846.
16. TERVANIEMI, M., SAARINEN, J., PAAVILAINEN, P., DANILOVA, N., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1994). Temporal integration of auditory information in sensory memory as reflected by mismatch negativity. Biological Psychology, 38, 157-167.
17. WARREN, R. M., & ACKROFF, J. M. (1976). Two types of auditory sequence perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 387-394.