Tracking visual search over space and time

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 292-300

  Olds, E S ^a,b   Cowan, W B ^a   Jolicoeur P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034198804     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212984     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BAUER, B., JOLICŒUR, P., & COWAN, W. B. (1996). Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly-separable from distractors. Vision Research, 36, 1439-1466.
2. BAUER, B., JOLICŒUR, P., & COWAN, W. B. (1998). The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1083-1093.
3. BAUER, B., JOLICŒUR, P., & COWAN, W. B. (1999). Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search. Vision Research 39, 2681-2695.
4. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
5. BRUNK, H. D. (1975). An introduction to mathematical statistics (3rd ed.). Lexington, MA: Xerox College Publishing.
6. CARRASCO, M., EVERT, D. L., CHANG, I., & KATZ, S. M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1241-1261.
7. CARRASCO, M., & FRIEDER, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37, 63-82.
8. CHUN, M. M., & WOLFE, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39-78.
9. D'ZMURA, M. (1991). Color in visual search. Vision Research, 31, 951-966.
10. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
11. JULESZ, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91-97.
12. OLDS, E. S., COWAN, W. B., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1999). Stimulus-determined discrimination mechanisms for color search. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1038-1045.
13. OLDS, E. S., COWAN, W. B., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2000). The time-course of pop-out search. Vision Research, 40, 891-912.
14. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
15. TREISMAN, A., & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
16. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
17. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
18. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
19. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.
20. WOLFE, J. M., O'NEILL, P., & BENNETT, S. C. (1998). Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 140-156.
21. WYSZECKI, G., & STILES, W. S. (1982). Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.