Effect of delay of reinforcement on superstitious inferences

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 1047-1058

  Rudski, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a MUHLENBERG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; ILLUSION; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT; SUPERSTITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SUPERSTITIONS;

EID: 0034197952     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.1047     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BARON, A., & GALIZIO, M. (1983) Instructional control and human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495-520.
2. BENASSI, V. A., SWEENY, P. D. & DREVNO, G. E. (1979) Mind over matter: perceived success at psychokinesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1377-1386.
3. BROWN, R., & HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1975) Psychology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
4. CATANIA A. C., & CUTTS, D. (1963) Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 203-208.
5. GRICE, G. R. (1948) The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 1-16.
6. HALL, J. F. (1976) Classical conditioning and instrumental learning: a contemporary approach. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
7. HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., HAAS, J. R., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1986a) Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137-147.
8. HAYES, S. C., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., ZETTLE, R. D., ROSENFARB, I., & KORN, Z. (1986b) Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237-256.
9. HELTZER, R. A., & VYSE, S. A. (1994) Intermittent consequences and problem solving: the experimental control of "superstitious" beliefs. The Psychological Record, 44, 155-169.
10. LANGER, E. J. (1975) The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
11. LASHLEY, K. S. (1924) Studies of the cerebral function in learning: V. The retention of motor habits after destruction of the so-called motor areas in primates. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 12, 249-276.
12. MATUTE, H. (1994) Learned helplessness and superstitious behavior as opposite effects of uncontrollable reinforcement in humans. Learning and Motivation, 25, 216-232.
13. MATUTE, H. (1995) Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 142-157.
14. MAZUR, J. E. (1998) Learning and behavior. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. MUENZINGER, K. F. (1928) Plasticity and mechanization of the problem box habit in guinea pigs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8, 45-69.
16. NINNESS, H. A., & NINNESS, S. K. (1998) Superstitious math performance: interactions between rules and scheduled contingencies. The Psychological Record, 48, 45-62.
17. ONO, K. (1987) Superstitious behavior in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 261-271.
18. ONO, K. (1994) Verbal control of superstitious behavior: superstitions as false rules. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. ONO (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press. Pp. 181-196.
19. RICHARDS, R. W. (1981) A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 145-152.
20. RUDSKI, J. M. LISCHNER, M. I. & ALBERT, L. M. (1999) Superstitious rule generation is affected by probability and type of outcome. The Psychological Record, 49, 245-260.
21. SHANKS, D. R. (1993) Human instrumental learning: a critical review of data and theory. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 319.
22. SHANKS, D. R., PEARSON, S. M., & DICKINSON, A. (1989) Temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality by human subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 139-159.
23. SHIMOFF, A. E., CATANIA, A. C., & MATTHEWS, B. A. (1981) Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencie. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207-220.
24. SKINNER, B. F. (1948) Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172.
25. STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971) The "superstition" experiment: a reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3-43.
26. THOMAS, G. V. (1981) Contiguity, reinforcement rate, and the law of effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33B, 33-43.
27. THORNDIKE, E. L. (1927) The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212-222.
28. VYSE, S. A. (1991) Behavioral variability and rule generation: general, restricted, and superstitious contingency statements. The Psychological Record, 41, 487-506.
29. VYSE, S. A. (1997) Believing in magic. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
30. WAGNER, M. W., & MORRIS, E. K. (1987) "Superstitious" behavior in children. The Psychological Record, 37, 471-488.
31. WASSERMAN, E. A. (1990) Detecting response-outcome relations: towards an understanding of the causal texture of the environmental. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 26. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 27-82.
32. WASSERMAN, E. A., & NEUNABER, D. J. (1986) College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: the role of temporal contiguity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 15-35.
33. WEIL, J. L. (1984) The effect of delayed reinforcement on free-operant responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 143-155.
34. WILLIAMS, B. A. (1976) The effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 441-449.