Teaching excellence: How faculty guided change at a research university

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 397-415

  Frost, Susan H ^b   Teodorescu, Daniel ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034196610     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2001.0007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aleamoni, L. M. (1987). Typical faculty concerns about student evaluation of teaching. In L. M. Aleamoni (Ed.), Techniques for evaluating and improving instruction (pp. 25-31). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No 31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
3. Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
4. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5. Boyer, E. L., Altbach, P. A., & Whitelaw, M. J. (1994). The academic profession: An international perspective. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Bess, J. L. (1992). Collegiality: Toward a clarification of meaning and function. In J. D. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 8, pp. 5-36). New York: Agathon Press.
7. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Commission on Teaching, Emory University (1997). Teaching at Emory. Available on-line at http://www.emory.edu/TEACHING/Report.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Eleser, C. B., & Chauvin, S. W. (1998). Professional development how to's: Strategies for surveying faculty preferences. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 181-199.
11. Frost, S. H. (1998). Using scholarship: Lessons for practice at one university. Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 219-234.
12. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Gray, P. J., Froh, R. C., & Diammond, R. M. (1992). A national study of research universities: On the balance between research and undergraduate teaching. ED350967.
14. Hall, D. T., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Organization design and job characteristics. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. LaCelle-Peterson, M. W., & Finkelstein, M. J. (1996). Institutions matter: Campus teaching environments' impact on senior faculty. In D. E. Finnegan, D. Webster, & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities (2nd ed.). ASHE Reader Series. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing.
16. Menges, R. J. (1997). Fostering faculty motivation to teach: Approaches to faculty development. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In J. Sulls & T. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Mooney, C. J. (1992, March 25). Syracuse tries to involve others in teaching-vs.-research debate. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A16.
19. Office of the Provost, Emory University (1994). Choices and responsibility: Shaping Emory's future. Available on-line at http://www.emory.edu/TEACHING/ Choices.
20. Richards, E., & Richards, T. (1991). The transformation of qualitative method: Computational paradigms and research process. In N. G. Fielding & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Using computers in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Ryan, J. J., Anderson, J. A., & Birchler, A. B. (1980). Student evaluation: The faculty responds. Research in Higher Education, 12, 317-333.
22. Seldin, P. (1993, July 21). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A40.
23. Serow, R. C., Brawner, C. E., & Demery, J. (1999). Instructional reform at research universities: Studying faculty motivation. The Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 411-423.
24. Tang, T. L. P., & Chamberlain, M. (1997). Attitudes toward research and teaching: Differences between administrators and faculty members. Journal of Higher Education, 68(2), 212-227.