A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 249-267

  Resnik, David B ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034195829     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Angell, M. (1996) Science on Trial (London: W. W. Norton).
2. Angell, M. and Kassirer, J. (1998) 'Alternative medicine - The risks of untested and unregulated remedies', New England Journal of Medicine 339(12), 839-841.
3. Ayer, A. (1946) Language, Truth, and Logic (New York: Dover).
4. Barnes, B. (1974) Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory (London: Routledge).
5. Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th Edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6. Black, B., Ayala, F. and Saffran-Brinks, C. (1994) 'Science and the law in the wake of Daubert: A new search for scientific knowledge', Texas Law Review 72(4), 715-802.
7. Brandon, R. (1990) Adaptation and Environment (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
8. Carnap, R. (1928) Der Logische Aufbau der Welt (Berlin: Welkreis).
9. Dalton, R. (1999) 'Kansas kicks evolution out of the classroom', Nature 400, 701.
10. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) No. 92-102, 28 June (113 S Ct 2768 1993).
11. Collins, H. (1982) The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (Bath: Bath University Press).
12. Dupré, J. (1993) The Disorder of Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
13. Dworkin, R. (1986) Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
14. Easterbrook, G. (1997) 'Greenhouse common sense', US News and World Report, 1 December, 58-62.
15. Feigl, H. (1949) 'Naturalism and humanism', American Quarterly 1, 135-148.
16. Feyerabend, P. (1975) Against Method (London: Verso).
17. Fox, R. and DeMarco, J. (1990) Moral Reasoning: A Philosophic Approach to Applied Ethics (Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston).
18. Gardner, M. (1957) Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (New York: Dover).
19. Giere, R. (1988) Explaining Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
20. Glymour, C. (1980) Theory and Evidence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
21. Goldman, A. (1991) 'Epistemic paternalism: Communication control in law and society', Journal of Philosophy 88, 113-131.
22. Gorovitz, S., Hintikka, M., Provence, D. and Williams, R. (1979) Philosophical Analysis, 3rd Edn. (New York: Random House).
23. Hempel, C. (1950) 'Problems and changes in the empiricist criteria of meaning', Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4(11), 41-63.
24. Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1989) Scientific Reasoning (La Salle, IL: Open Court).
25. Huber, P. (1991) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (New York: Basic Books).
26. Kaiser, J. (1998) 'Possibly vast greenhouse gas sponge ignites controversy', Science 2, 386-387.
27. Kitcher, P. (1983) Abusing Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
28. Kitcher, P. (1992) 'The naturalists return', Philosophical Review 101(1), 53-114.
29. Kitcher, P. (1993) The Advancement of Science (New York: Oxford University Press).
30. Kitcher, P. (1996) The Lives to Come (New York: Simon and Schuster).
31. Kluger, J. (1999) 'DNA detectives', Time, 11 January, 62-63.
32. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
33. Kosso, P. (1992) Reading the Book of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
34. Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
35. Kuhn, T. (1970) 'The logic of discovery or the psychology of research?', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-24.
36. Lakatos, I. (1970) 'Falsificationism and the methodology of scientific research programmes', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 91-196.
37. Lakatos, I. (1977) 'Science and pseudoscience', in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-7.
38. Laudan, L. (1977) Progress and its Problems (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
39. Laudan, L. (1982) 'Science at the bar - Causes for concern', Science, Technology, and Human Values 7(41), 16-19.
40. Laudan, L. (1984) Science and Values (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
41. Little, M. (1995) Humane Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
42. Loevinger, L. (1995) 'Science as evidence', Jurimetrics Journal 20, 153-190.
43. Loftus, E. (1995) 'Remembering dangerously', Skeptical Inquirer 19(2), 20-29.
44. Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
45. Mahlman, J. (1997) 'Uncertainties in projections of human-caused global warming', Science 278, 1416-1417.
46. Martino, J. (1992) Science Funding (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).
47. Mayo, D. (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
48. McKusick, V. et al. (eds) (1992). DNA Technology in Forensic Science (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
49. Merton, R. (1973) The Sociology of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
50. Miller, P. and Rein, B. (1998) 'Whither Daubert: Reliable resolution of scientifically-based causality issues in toxic tort cases', Rutgers Law Review 50, 563-584.
51. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education).
52. National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
53. Petroski, H. (1999) 'Daubert and Khumo', American Scientist 87(5), 402-06.
54. Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Harper and Row).
55. Pressley, M. (1998) Reading Instruction that Works: The Case for a Balanced Approach to Reading (New York: Guilford Press).
56. Quine, W. and Ullian, J. (1978) The Web of Belief (New York: Random House).
57. Reisch, G. (1998) 'Pluralism, logical empiricism, and the problem of pseudoscience', Philosophy of Science 65(2), 333-348.
58. Resnik, D. (1993) 'Do scientific aims justify methodological rules?', Erkenntnis 38, 223-232.
59. Resnik, D. (1998) The Ethics of Science: An Introduction (New York: Routledge).
60. Rudner, R. (1953) 'The scientists qua scientist makes value judgments', Philosophy of Science 20, 1-6.
61. Ruse, M. (1982) 'Pro judice', Science, Technology, and Human Values 7(41), 19-23.
62. Salmon, W. (1989) Four Decades of Scientific Explanation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
63. Schlossberger, E. (1993) The Ethical Engineer (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
64. Shadish, W. and Fuller, S. (eds) (1994) The Social Psychology of Science (New York: Guilford Press).
65. Shapere, D. (1984) Reason and the Search for Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel).
66. Stix, G. (1996) 'Probing medicine's outer reaches', Scientific American 275(40), 52-56.
67. Thagard, P. (1978) 'Why astrology is a pseudoscience', in P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds), Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1 (East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association), pp. 223-224.
68. Thagard, P. (1988) Computational Philosophy of Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
69. Thagard, P. (1993) Conceptual Revolutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
70. Van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
71. Ziman, J. (1968) Public Knowledge (New York: Cambridge University Press).