Quantitative modeling and technology driven departmental course scheduling

Omega

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 327-346

  Boronico, Jess ^a  

^a MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Course time tabling; Hierarchical modeling; Mathematical programming; Optimization; Scheduling; Simulation

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION; TEACHING;

COURSE SCHEDULING; COURSE TIME TABLING; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVES; OPTIMISATIONS; QUANTITATIVE MODELS; SCHEDULING; SIMULATION; TIME TABLING; UNDERGRADUATE COURSES;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 0034195814     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00056-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Harwood GB, Lawless RW. Optimizing organizational goals in assigning faculty teaching schedules. Decision Sciences 1975;6:513-24.
2. Shih W, Sullivan JA. A dynamic course scheduling for college faculty via zero-one programming. Decision Sciences 1977;8:711-21.
3. Mulvey JM. A classroom/time assignment model. European Journal of Operational Research 1983;9:64-70.
4. Nordland G. Timetabling Problem Research. Unpublished technical report, Space Management and Academic Scheduling Office, Purdue University, 1986.
5. Andrew GM, Collins R. Matching Faculty to Courses. College and University 1971;46(2):83-9.
6. Selim SM. An algorithm for constructing a University faculty timetable. Computers in Education 1982;6(4):323-32.
7. Selim SM. An algorithm for producing course and lecturer timetables. Computers in Education 1983;7(2):101-7.
8. Hertz A. Tabu search for large-scale timetabling problems. European Journal of Operational Research 1991;54:39-47.
9. Tripathy A. School timetabling: A case in large binary integer linear programming. Management Science 1984;30(12): 1473-89.
10. Cangelovic M, Schreuder JAM. An exact coloring algorithm for weighted graphs applied to timetabling problems with lectures of different lengths. European Journal of Operational Research 1991;51:248-58.
11. Burke EK, Elliman DG, Weare RF. Automated scheduling of University exams. In: Proceedings of IEEE Colloquium on Resource Scheduling for Large Scale Planning Systems, 1993. p. 142-8 (Digest No. 1993/144).
12. Sampson SE, Freeland JR, Weiss EN. Class scheduling to maximize participant satisfaction. Interfaces 1995;25(1):30-41.
13. White GM, Wong KS. Interactive timetabling in Universities. Computers in Education 1988;12(4):521-9.
14. Stallaert J. Automated timetabling improves course scheduling at UCLA. Interfaces 1997;27(4):67-81.
15. Kingston JH. http: //www.di.uminho.pt/ftp/pub/DI/ Fundamentos/Bibs/bibliography/Misc/timetabling.html, 1995.
16. Dinkel JJ, Mote J, Venkataramanan. An efficient decision support system for academic course scheduling. Operations Research 1989;37(6):853-64.
17. Badri MA. A two-stage multiobjective scheduling model for faculty-course-time assignments. European Journal of Operational Research 1996;94(1):16-29.
18. Ferland JA, Fleurent C. SAPHIR: A Decision Support System for Course Scheduling, 1994, 24(2), 105-115.
19. Kaier L, Yellen J. Weighted graphs and University timetabling. Computers & Operations Research 1992;19(1):59-68.
20. Drud AS, Bagsvaerdvej S. CONOPT: A large-scale GRG code. ORSA Journal on Computing 1994;6(2):207-17.
21. Liebman J, Lasdon L, Waren A, Schrage L. Modeling and Optimization with GINO. Massachusetts: Boyd & Fraser, 1986.