Sex differences in subjective distress to violations of trust: Extending an evolutionary perspective

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 101-109

  Cramer, Robert Ervin ^a   Manning Ryan, Barbara ^b   Johnson, Lesley M ^a   Barbo, Elizabeth ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ALLIANT INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034195399     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. Batten, M. (1992). Sexual strategies: How females choose their mates. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
3. Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654-676.
4. Buss, D. M. (1987). Sex differences in human mate selection criteria: An evolutionary perspective. In C. Crawford, D. Krebs, & M. Smith (Eds.), Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
6. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
7. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
8. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251-255.
9. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
10. Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359-363.
11. Cramer, R. E., Schaefer, J. T., & Reid, S. (1996). Identifying the ideal mate: More evidence for male/female convergence. Current Psychology, 15, 157-166.
12. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
13. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11-27.
14. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
15. Degler, C. N. (1991). In search of human nature: The decline and revival of Darwinism in American social thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16. DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the "fitness" of the model. Psychological Science, 7, 367-372.
17. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1158-1166.
18. Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love: The mysteries of mating, marriage, and why we stray. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
19. Harris, C. R., & Christenfeld, N. (1996). Gender, jealousy, and reason. Psychological Science, 7, 364-366.
20. Hupka, R. B., & Bank, A. L. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution or social construction. Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 24-59.
21. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
22. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
23. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G. E., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97-116.
24. Landolt, M. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: An evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3-23.
25. Paul, L., & Galloway, J. (1994). Sexual jealousy: Gender differences in response to partner and rival. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 203-211.
26. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738.
27. Sprecher, S. (1989). The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles, 21, 591-607.
28. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.
30. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
31. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
32. Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
33. Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331-335.
34. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115-124.
35. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). Gender differences in sexual jealousy: Adaptionist or social learning explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 115-140.
36. Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Pantheon.