Teachers' coaching of learning and its relation to students' strategic learning

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 342-348

  Hamman, Douglas ^a   Berthelot, Joelle ^b   Saia, Jodi ^b   Crowley, Ellen ^b  

^a MERRIMACK COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034195038     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.342     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309-332.
2. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
3. Archer, A. L., & Isaacson, S. L. (1990). Teaching others how to teach strategies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 63-72.
4. Burkhardt, R. M. (1994). The inquiry process: Student-centered learning. Logan, IA: Perfection Learning Corporation.
5. Clift, R. T., Ghatala, E. S., Naus, M. M., & Poole, J. (1990). Exploring teachers' knowledge of strategic study activity. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 253-263.
6. Duffy, G. G. (1993). Teachers' progress toward becoming expert strategy teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 109-120.
7. Duffy, G. G., & Roehler, L. R. (1989). Why strategy instruction is so difficult and what we need to do about it. In C. B. McCormick, G. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 133-154). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Durkin, D. (1978). What classroom observations reveal abut reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
9. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Young adolescent development. In J. L. Irving (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 15-29). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
10. Eisner, E. W. (1998). The kind of schools we need: Personal essays. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. George, P. S., Lawrence, G., & Bushnell, D. (1998). Handbook for middle school teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
12. Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of "metacognitive" studies. Educational Researcher, 58, 5-8.
13. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
14. James, M. (1986). Advisor-advisee programs: Why, what, and how. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
15. Kellough, R. D., & Kellough, N. G. (1996). Middle school teaching: A guide to methods and resources (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
16. McCombs, B. L. (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Jenkins, D. M. (1996). America's middle schools: Practices and progress: A 25-year perspective. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
18. Moely, B. E., Hart, S. S., Leal, L., Santulli, K. A., Rao, N., Johnson, T., and Hamilton, L. B. (1992). The teacher's role in facilitating memory and study strategy development in the elementary school classroom. Child Development, 63, 653-672.
19. Moore, K. D. (1999). Middle and secondary school instructional methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (1996, September). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
21. National Middle School Association (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
22. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 240-272.
23. Pintrich, P. R., & Smith, D. A. F. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learnining Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurment, 53, 801-813.
24. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991) A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
25. Pressley, M., Gaskins, I. W., Cunicelli, E. A., Burdick, N. J., Schaub-Matt, M., Lee, D. S., & Powell, N. (1991). Strategy instruction at Benchmark School: A faculty interview study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 19-48.
26. Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
27. Ridley, D. S., McCombs, B. L., & Taylor, K. (1994). Walking the talk: Fostering self-regulated learning in the classroom. Middle School Journal, 26, 52-57.
28. Rosenshine, B. (1995). Introduction. In M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance (2nd ed., pp. i-vii). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
29. Rosenshine, B. (1997, March). The case for explicit, teacher-led cognitive strategy instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411-419.
31. Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1993). The essential middle school. New York: Macmillan.
32. Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 297-314). New York: Macmillan.
33. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.