Effects of loading conditions and objective function on three-dimensional shape optimization of femoral components of hip endoprostheses

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 243-251

  Katoozian, Hamid ^a   Davy, Dwight T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

Author keywords

Hip implant; Interface; Optimization; Prosthesis; Von Mises stress

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; STRAIN; STRESS ANALYSIS;

HIP ENDOPROSTHESES; VON MISES STRESS;

HIP PROSTHESES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; LOADING TEST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0034189972     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4533(00)00030-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Russotti G.M., Coventry M.B., Stauffer R.N. Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. Clin. Orthop. 235:1988;139-147.
2. Sandborn S.D., Harding A.F., Kester M.A. Clinical performance of endoprosthetic and total hip replacement systems. J. Rehab. Res. 24:1987;49-56.
3. Blake T.A., Davy D.T., Saravanos D.A., Hopkins D.A. Numerical optimization of composite hip endoprostheses. Proceedings of 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 1992;119-129.
4. Beus A.M., Hoeltzel D.A., Eftakhar N.S. Design optimization of a prosthesis stem reinforcing shell in total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomech. Eng. 112:1990;347-357.
5. Huiskes R., Boeklagen R. Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. J. Biomech. 22:1989;793-804.
6. Yoon Y.S., Jang G.H., Kim Y.Y. Shape optimal design of the stem of a cemented hip prosthesis to minimize stress concentration in the cement layer. J. Biomech. 22:1989;1279-1284.
7. Lewis J.L. The mechanical state of the bone-implant interface. Fitzgerald R. Jr. Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. 1988;23-30 Raven Press Ltd, New York.
8. Branson PJ, Steege J, Wixon RL, Stulberg SD. Rigidity of initial fixation in non cemented total knee tibial components. Trans 33rd Orthop Res Soc 1987:12.
9. Uhthoff HK, Germain JP. The reversal of tissue differentiation around screws. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977:248-56.
10. Bucknall C.B. Bucknall C.B. Toughened plastics. 1977;101-134 Applied Science, London.
11. Sih G.C., Macdonald B. Fracture mechanics applied to engineering problems - strain energy density criterion. Eng. Fract. Mech. 6:1974;361-386.
12. Katoozian H. Three dimensional design optimization of femoral components of total hip endoprostheses. PhD dissertation. Cleveland (OH): Case Western Reserve University, 1993.
13. ABAQUS ver. 4.9, users manual. 1989;Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc, Rhode Island.
14. DOT ver. 3.00, users manual. 1992;VMA Engineering Inc, Goelta (CA).
15. DOC ver. 2.04B, users manual. 1990;VMA Engineering Inc, Goelta (CA).
16. Vanderplaats G.N., Moses F. Structural optimization by method of feasible directions. J. Comp. Struct. 3:1973;739-755.
17. Beaumont P.W.R., Plumpton B. The strength of acrylic bone cements and acrylic cement stainless steel interfaces, part II. J. Mater. Sci. 12:1977;1853-1856.
18. Vasu R., Carter D.R., Harris W.H. Evaluation of bone cement failure criteria, with application to the acetabular region. J. Biomech. Eng. 105:1983;332-337.
19. Carter D.R. Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. J. Biomech. 20:1987;1095-1109.
20. Fyhrie D.P., Carter D.R. Femoral head apparent density distribution predicted from bone stresses. J. Biomech. 23:1990;1-10.
21. Raab S., Ahmed A.M., Provan J.W. The quasistatic and fatigue performance of the implant/bone-cement interface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15:1981;159-182.
22. Sih G.C. Sih G.C. Mechanics of fracture initiation and propagation. 1991;25-120 Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
23. Hearn D., Baker M.P. Hearn D., Baker M.P. Computer graphics. 1986;210-235 Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey.
24. Kotzar G.M., Davy D.T., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., Berilla J., Heiple K.G. Jr., Brown R.H., Burstein A.H. Telemetrized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery. J. Orthop. Res. 9:1991;621-633.
25. Linder L. Ultrastructure of the bone-cement and the bone-metal interface. Clin. Orthop. 276:1990;147-156.
26. Huiskes R. Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;Suppl no 185.
27. Mann K.A., Bartel D.L., Wright T.M., Ingraffea A.R. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J. Orthop. Res. 9:1991;798-808.
28. Shirazi-Adl A. Finite element stress analysis of a push-out test part I: fixed interface using stress compatible elements. J. Biomech. Eng. 114:1992;111-118.
29. Waters S. THA design optimisation under multiple load conditions. MS thesis. Cleveland (OH): Case Western Reserve University, 1994.