A new method to quantify wear using implant supported restorations

Dental Materials

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 218-225

  Wiskott, H W A ^a   Perriard, J ^a   Scherrer, S S ^a   Belser, U C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dental materials; Dental restoration wear; Materials testing; MeSH

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MICROCOMPUTER; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL VENEERS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROCOMPUTERS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034188293     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00012-9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restora-tive materials. US Department HEW Monograph No 790-244. San Francisco: US GPO, 1971.
2. ADA, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Guidelines for submission of composite resin materials for occlusal class I and class II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1981;102:349-50.
3. ADA, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Revised guidelines for submission of composite resin materials for occlusal class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:707-9.
4. Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, Racz WB. Clinical evaluation methods for posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1984;63:1387-91.
5. Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1986;2:198-201.
6. Lugassy AA, Moffa JP. Laboratory model for the quantification of clinical occlusal wear. J Dent Res 1985;64(63):181.
7. Mair LH. The measurement and analysis of clinical abrasion - a modified approach. Dent Mater 1990;6:271-5.
8. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Correlation of M-L, Leinfelder, and USPHS clinical evaluation techniques for wear. Dent Mater 1990;6:151-3.
9. Chadwick RG, McCabe JF, Walls AW, Mitchell HL, Storer R. Comparison of a novel photogrammetric technique and modified USPHS criteria to monitor the wear of restorations. J Dent 1991;19:39-45.
10. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Rekow ED, Wilder AD, Heyman HO. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards. Dent Mater 1994;10:11-8.
11. Kusy RP, Leinfelder KF. Pattern of wear in posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1977;56:544.
12. Roulet JF. Development of appropriate measuring devices. In: Degradation of dental polymers. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1987:101-8.
13. Bartlett DW, Blunt L, Smith BGN. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J 1997;182:179-84.
14. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76:1799-807.
15. Jørgensen KD, Asmussen E. Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine filler - an initial study. Quintessence Int 1978;9:73-8.
16. Atkinson JT, Groves D, Lalor MJ, Cunningham MJ, Williams DF. The measurement of wear in dental restorations using laser dual-source contouring. Wear 1982;76:91-104.
17. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Vuylsteke M, Davidson CL. Quantitative evaluation of the wear, resistance of posterior dental restorations: a new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 1984;12:252-67.
18. Adams LP, Wilding RJC. Tooth wear measurements using a reflex microscope. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:605-13.
19. Mayhall JT, Kageyama I. A new, three-dimensional method for determining tooth wear. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997;103:463-9.
20. McDowell GC, Bloem TJ, Lang BR, Asgar K. In vivo wear. Part I: the Michigan computer-graphic measuring system. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:112-20.
21. Lutz F, Imfeld T, Meier C, Firestone A. Composite versus amalgam - comparative measurements of in vivo wear resistance: one year report. Quintessence Int 1979;3:77-87.
22. DeLong R, Pintado M, Douglas WH. Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics. Dent Mater 1985;1:27-30.
23. Glentworth P, Harrison A, Moores GE. Measurement of changes in surface profile due to wear using a 147 Pm B particle backscatter technique. II. Applications to the simulated wear of dental composite resin and amalgam restorations. Wear 1984;93:53-9.
24. Harrison A, Moores GE, Glentworth P. Measurement of changes in surface profile due to wear using a 147 Pm B particle backscatter technique. I. Instrument development and application to control changes in surface profile. Wear 1984;93:37-52.
25. Price RB, Gerrow JD, Sutow EJ, MacSween. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:169-74.
26. Ekfeldt A, Öilo G. Wear of prosthodontic materials - an in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:117-29.
27. Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:313-20.
28. Haut TL, Hull ML, Howell SM. A high-accuracy three-dimensional coordinate digitizing system for reconstructing the geometry of diarthrodial joints. J Biomech 1998;31:571-7.
29. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vitro wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989:752-1754.
30. Mitchell HL, Chadwick RG. Mathematical shape matching as a tool in tooth wear assessment - development and conduct. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:921-8.
31. Hewlett ER, Orro ME. Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. Dent Mater 1992;8:49-53.
32. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:914-20.