Variations between foundation-level and free-field earthquake ground motions

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 511-532

  Stewart, Jonathan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FOUNDATIONS; KINEMATICS; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

FOUNDATION-LEVEL PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION; FREE-FIELD EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS;

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

EID: 0034187254     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586124     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., 1988, Empirical models of spatial coherency of strong ground motion, Proceedings 2nd Workshop on Strong Motion Arrays, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, 65-92.
2. Abrahamson, N. A., Schneider, J. F., and Stepp, J. C., 1991, Empirical spatial coherency functions for application to soil-structure interaction analyses, Earthquake Spectra, 7 (1), 1-27.
3. Abrahamson, N. A. and Silva, W. J., 1997, Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seism. Res, Letters, 68 (1), 94-127.
4. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., Oliver, A. A., and Page, R. A., 1980, Peak acceleration, velocity, and displacement from strong-motion records, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70 (1), 305-321.
5. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., and Fumal, T. E., 1997, Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seism. Res. Letters, 68 (1), 128-153.
6. th NEHRP Workshop, Salt Lake City, Utah, Report No. USGS OFR 84-763.
7. Campbell, K. W., 1984b, Observed structural modification of recorded strong ground motion, in Critical Aspects of Earthquake Ground Motion and Building Damage Potential, Applied Technology Council, Report No. ATC-10-1, Palo Alto, CA, 43-52.
8. Campbell, K. W., 1986, Empirical predition of free-field ground motion using statistical regression models, in Proceedings Soil-Structure Interaction Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 12-24.
9. Campbell, K. W., 1997, Empirical near-source attenuation relations fore horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Letters, 68 (1), 154-179.
10. Chang, C.-Y., Power, M. S., Idriss, I. M., Somerville, P. G., Silva, W. J., and Chen, P. C., 1985, Engineering characterization of ground motion. Task 2: Observational data on spatial variations of earthquake ground motion, Report No. NUREG/CR-3805, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, February.
11. Chopra, A. K., 1995, Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 192.
12. Day, S. M., 1978, Seismic response of embedded foundations, Proceedings ASCE Convention, Chicago, IL, October, Preprint 3450.
13. Duke, C. M., Luco, J. E., Carriveau, A. R., Hradilek, P. J., Lastico, R., and Ostrom, D., 1970, Strong earthquake motion and site conditions: Hollywood, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 60 (4), 1274-1289.
14. Elsabee, F. and Morray, J. P., 1977, Dynamic behavior of embedded foundations, Report No. R77-33, Dept. of Civil Engrg., Massachusetts Inst. Technology.
15. Housner, G. W., 1959, Interaction of building and ground during and earthquake, Bull Seism. Soc. Am., 47 (3), 179-186.
16. Idriss, I. M., 1991, Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites, A Report to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Univ. of California, Davis. (rev. Sept. 1993)
17. Kim, S. and Stewart, J. P., 2000, Kinematic soil-structure interaction from strong motion recordings, J. Geotech.. & Geoenv. Engrg., ASCE (in review).
18. Kramer, S. L., 1996, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 294-303.
19. th World Conference on Earthquake Engrg., Paper 317.
20. Lee, V. W., Trifunac, M. D., and Feng, C. C., 1982, Effects of foundation size on Fourier spectrum amplitudes of earthquake accelerations recorded in building, Soil Dyn. Eq. Engrg., 1 (2), 52-58.
21. Lee, V. W. and Trifunac, M. D., 1996, Characteristics of earthquake response spectra in southern California, Report to California Dept. of Transportation, and City and County of Los Angeles, Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, CA.
22. McCann, M. W. and Boore, D. M., 1983, Variability in ground motions: Root mean square acceleration and peak acceleration for the 1971 San Fernando, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73 (2), 615-632.
23. Moslem, K. and Trifunac, M. D., 1987, Spectral amplitudes of strong earthquake accelerations recorded in buildings, Soil Dyn. Eq. Engrg., 6 (2), 100-107.
24. Newmark, N. M., Hall, W. J., and Morgan, J. R., 1977, Comparison of building response and free field motion in earthquakes, Proceedings 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engrg., Sarita Prakashan, Meerut, India, Vol. II, 972-978.
25. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J. A., Makdisi, F., and Youngs, R. R., 1997, Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data, Seism. Res. Letters, 68 (1), 180-189.
26. Scanlan, R. H., 1976, Seismic wave effects on soil-structure interaction, Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 4, 379-388.
27. Seed, H. B. and Lysmer, J., 1980, The seismic soil-structure interaction problem for nuclear facilities, in Soil-structure interaction: The status of current analysis methods and research, J.J. Johnson, ed., Report No. NUREG/CR-1780 and UCRL-53011, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com., Washington DC and Lawrence Livermore Lab., Livermore, CA.
28. Seismological Research Letters, 1997, Special issue on ground motion attenuation relations. 68 (1). January/February.
29. Stewart, J. P., 1996, An empirical assessment of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic response of structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, U.C. Berkeley.
30. Stewart, J. P. and Kim, S., 1998, Empirical verification of soil-structure interaction provisions in building codes, in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics-III, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 75, P. Dakoulas, M. Yegian, and R. D. Holtz (editors), 1259-1270.
31. Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., and Fenves, G. L., 1999, Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical results, J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Engrg., ASCE, 125 (1), 39-48.
32. Stewart, J. P. and Stewart, A. F., 1997, Analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on building response from earthquake strong motion recordings at 58 sites, Report No. UCB/EERC-97/01, Earthquake Engrg. Research Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, 742 pp.
33. Trifunac, M. D., 1972, Interaction of a shear wall with the soil for incident plane SH waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 62 (1), 63-83.
34. Trifunac, M. D., 1976a, Preliminary analysis of the peaks of strong earthquake ground motion-Dependence of peaks on earthquake magnitude, epicentral distance, and recording site conditions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66 (1), 189-219.
35. Trifunac, M. D., 1976b, Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source-to-station distance, and recording site condition, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66 (4), 1343-1373.
36. Trifunac, M. D. and Todorovska, M. I., 1996, Nonlinear soil response - 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Engrg., ASCE, 122 (9), 725-735.
37. Veletsos, A. S., 1977, Dynamics of structure-foundation systems, Structural and Geotechnical Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 333-361.
38. Veletsos, A. S. and Prasad, A. M., 1989, Seismic interaction of structures and soils: stochastic approach, J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115 (4), 935-956.
39. Veletsos, A. S., Prasad, A. M., and Wu, W. H., 1997, Transfer functions for rigid rectangular foundations, J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dynamics, 26 (1), 5-17.
40. Yamahara, H., 1970, Ground motions during earthquakes and the input loss of earthquake power to an excitation of buildings, Soils and Foundations, 10 (2), 145-161.