IRB-identified ethical issues in nursing research

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 140-148

  Olsen, Douglas P ^a   Mahrenholz, Donna ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit; Confidentiality; Ethics; Informed consent; IRB; OPRR; Research; Risk; Vulnerable populations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS, NURSING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0034186545     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/PN.2000.5918     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Appelbaum, P., Roth, L., Lidz, C., Benson, P., & Winslade, W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 17, 20-24.
2. Amdur, R., & Biddle, C. (1997). Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. JAMA, 277, 909-914.
3. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Butzow, M. (1995). Getting through the IRB: Covenant Medical Center Nursing Research Committee's experience. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 21, 262-263.
5. DHHS, NIH, Office for Protection from Research Risk. (June 18, 1991). Protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations, Tile 45, Part 46. [Federal Register 56:28003-28032. Appendix 4, A4-35-A4-49.]
6. Edgar, H., & Rothman, D. (1995). The institutional review board and beyond: Future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. The Milbank Quarterly, 73, 489-506.
7. Freedman, B. (1987). Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 141-145.
8. Glenister, D. (1996). Focus. Nursing research ethics: some problems and recommended changes. NTResearch, 1, 184-190.
9. Gray, B. (1975). Human subjects in medical experimentation: A sociological study of the Conduct and regulation of clinical research. New York, Wiley & Sons.
10. Grodin, M., Zaharoff, B., & Kaminow, P. (1986). A 12-year audit of IRB decisions. QRB, 12, 82-86.
11. Larson, E. (1994). Exclusion of certain groups from clinical research. Image, 26, 185-190.
12. Levine, R. (1986). Ethics and the regulation of clinical research (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
13. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1998). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. (Vol. 1). Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
14. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. OPPR Reports. Appendix 6, A6-7-A6-14.
15. Oddi, L. F., & Cassidy, V. R. (1990). Nursing research in the United States: The protection of human subjects. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 27, 21-33.
16. Rajagopal, S., Goodman, P., & Tannock, I. (1994). Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: Discordance between physicians' perception of benefit and the results of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12, 1296-1304.
17. Riecken, H., & Ravich, R. (1982). Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans' Administration Hospitals. JAMA, 248, 344-348.
18. Waggoner, W., & Mayo, D. (1995). Who understands? A survey of 25 words or phrases commonly used in proposed clinical research consent forms. IRB, 17, 6-9.