A preventive services program model for preserving and supporting families over time

Child Welfare

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 227-265

  McCartt Hess, Peg ^a   McGowan, Brenda G ^a   Botsko, Michael ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEW YORK CITY; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 0034186229     PISSN: 00094021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Allen, M., Brown, P., & Finlay, B. (1993). Helping children by strengthening families: A look at family support programs. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.
2. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (1996). Getting smart, getting real. Using research and evaluation information to improve programs and policies. Report of the Annie E. Casey Foundation's September 1995 research and evaluation conference. Baltimore: Author.
3. Berry, M. (1992). An evaluation of family preservation services: Fitting agency services to family needs. Social Work, 37, 314-321.
4. Besharov, D. (1994). Looking beyond 30, 60, and 90 days. Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 445-451.
5. Center for Family Life. (1997). Center for Family Life annual progress report. New York: Author.
6. Children's Bureau of Los Angeles. (1991). Family Assessment Form and users' guide. Los Angeles: Author.
7. Children's Bureau of Southern California. (1997). Family Assessment Form: A practice-based approach to assessing family functioning. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
8. Citizens' Committee for Children of New York, Inc. (1997). Keeping track of New York City's children. New York: Author.
9. Cole, E., & Duva, J. (1990). Family preservation: An orientation for administrators and practitioners. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, Inc.
10. Denzin, N. (1978). The research act. New York: McGraw Hill.
11. Dore, M. (1993). Family preservation and poor families: When "Homebuilding" is not enough. Families in Society, 74, 545-556.
12. Dore, M., & Alexander, L. (1996). Preserving families at risk of child abuse and neglect: The role of the helping alliance. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 349-361.
13. Feldman, L. (1990). Evaluating the impact of family preservation services in New Jersey. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, Bureau of Research, Evaluation and Quality Assurance.
14. Fraser, M., Nelson, K., & Rivard, J. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research, 21, 138-153.
15. Fraser, M., Pecora, P., & Haapala, D. (Eds.) (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services. New York: Aldine.
16. Garbarino, J. (1987). Family support and the prevention of child maltreatment. In S. Kagan, D. Powell, B. Weissbourd, & E. Zigler (Eds.), America's family support programs: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 99-114). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Gabinet, L. (1983). Shared parenting: A new paradigm for the treatment of child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 403-411.
18. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
19. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
20. Halpern, R. (1991). Supportive services for families in poverty: Dilemmas of reform. Social Service Revieiv, 65, 343-364.
21. Hess, P., & Folaron, G. (1993). The Professional Review Action Group (PRAG) model: A user's guide. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, Inc.
22. Jones, M., Neuman, R., & Shyne, A. (1976). A second chance for families: Evaluation of a program to reduce foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of America, Inc.
23. Kagan, S., Powell, D., Weissbourd, B., & Zigler, E. (Eds.). (1987). America's family support programs: Perspectives and prospects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24. Kagan, S., & Shelley, A. (1987). The promise and problems of family support programs. In S. Kagan, D. Powell, B. Weissbourd, and E. Zigler (Eds.). America's family support programs: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 3-18). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Kagan, S., & Weissbourd, B. (Eds.). (1994). Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
26. Kinney, J., Haapala, D., & Booth, C. (1991). Keeping families together: The Homebuilders model. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
27. Kinney, J., Madsen, B., Fleming, T., and Haapala, D. (1977). Homebuilders: Keeping families together. Journal of Clinical and Counseling Psychology, 43: 667-673.
28. Lightburn, A., & Kemp, S. (1994). Family-support programs: Opportunities for community-based practice. Families in Society, 75, 16-26.
29. Lindsey, D. (1994). Family preservation and child protection: Striking a balance. Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 279-294.
30. McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1997). Family presentation and family functioning. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
31. McCroskey, J., Nishimoto, R., & Subramanian, K. (1991). Assessment in family support programs: Initial reliability and validity testing of the Family Assessment Form. Child Welfare, 70, 19-33.
32. McGowan, B. (1990). Family-based services and public policy: Context and implications. In J. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E. Tracy, & C. Booth (Eds.). Reaching high risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services (pp. 65-87). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
33. Nelson, K. (1997). Family preservation - What is it? Children and Youth Services Review, 19, 10-118.
34. Nelson, K., Landsman, M., & Deutelbaum, W. (1990). Three models of family-centered placement prevention services. Child Welfare, 69, 3-21.
35. Orum, A., Feagin, J., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds). (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
36. Pecora, P. Fraser, M., Nelson, K., McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1995). Evaluating family-based services. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
37. Powell, D. (1994). Evaluating family support programs: Are we making progress? In S. Kagan & B. Weissbourd (Eds), Putting families first: America's family support movement and the challenge of change (pp. 441-469). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
38. Rossi, P. (1992). Assessing family preservation programs. Children and Youth Services Review, 14, 77-97.
39. Schorr, L., & Schorr, D. (1988). Within our reach. New York: Doubleday.
40. Schuerman, J., Rzepnicki, T., & Littell, J. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
41. Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Turner, B. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organizing the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225-247.
45. Weiss, H., & Jacobs, F. (1988). Evaluating family programs. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
46. Weissbourd, B. (1987). A brief history of family support programs. In S. Kagan, D. Powell, B. Weissbourd, & E. Zigler (Eds.), America's family support programs: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 38-56). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Weissbourd, B., & Kagan, S. (1989). Family support programs: Catalysts for change. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 20-31.
48. Wells, K., & Biegel, D. (Eds.). (1991). Family preservation services: Research and evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Wells, K., & Freer, R. (1994). Reading between the lines: The case for qualitative research in intensive family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 399-415.
50. Wells, K., & Whittington, D. (1993). Child and family functioning after intensive family preservation services. Social Service Review, 67, 55-83.
51. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and method (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52. Zigler, E., & Black, K. (1989). America's family support movement: Strengths and limitations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 6-19.