Magnetic resonance arthrography of the canine stifle joint: Technique and applications in eleven military dogs

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 200-213

  Banfield, Catherine M ^a   Morrison, William B ^b  

^a Lackland Air Force Base ^*  (United States)

^b WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthrography; Canine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stifle

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DOG; DOG DISEASE; HINDLIMB; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; ARTHROGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; JOINT DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STIFLE; UNITED STATES; VETERINARY SERVICE, MILITARY;

EID: 0034185502     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01479.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Braunstein EM, Visco DM, O'Connor BL. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging and application to the stifle joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;198:1914-1922.
2. Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Braunstein EM, Hill MA, O'Connor BL, Visco DM. Radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging of the stifle joint in experimental osteoarthritis of dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1994; 35:371-383.
3. Chan WP, Fritz RC, Stenibach LS, Wu CY, Genant HK, Cannon WD. The knee: internal derangements. In: Chan WP, Lang P, Genant HK. MRI of the musculoskeletal system. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994: 263-306.
4. Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Basset LW, Mandelbaum B, Duckwiler G, Gold RH. MR imaging of the knee, Part I. Traumatic disorders. Radiol 1987;162:547-551.
5. Mink JH, Reicher MA, Crues JV, Deutsch AL. MRI of the knee, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1993.
6. Munk PL, Helms CA. MRI of the knee, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
7. Hartzman S, Reicher MA, Basset LW, Duckwiler G, Mandelbaum B, Gold RH. MR imaging of the knee, Part II. Chronic disorders. Radiol 1987;162:553-557.
8. Berquist TH. MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:285-410.
9. Sartoris DJ. Musculoskeletal imaging: the requisites. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996:18-29.
10. Schoenberg NY, Beltran J. Contrast enhancement in musculoskeletal imaging, current status. Radiol Clin of N Am 1994;32:337-351.
11. Brossman J, Preidler K-W, Daenen B, et al. Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers. Radiol 1996;200:509-517.
12. Helgason JW, Chandnani VP, Yu JS. MR arthrography: a review of current technique and applications. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1473-1480.
13. Beltran J, Chandnani V, McGhee RA, Kursunoglu-Brahme S. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:457-466.
14. Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, et al: MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:829-832.
15. Stoller DW. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint. Radiol Clinics of N Am 1997, 35:97-116.
16. Berquist TH, Morin RH. General technical considerations in musculoskeletal MRI. In: Berquist TH. MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 3rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott-Raven, 1996:63-98.
17. Majumdar S. Magnetic resonance imaging: basic principles and techniques, in Chan WP, Lang P, Genant HK. MRI of the musculoskeletal system. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:47-68.
18. Resnick D, Kang HS. Knee. In: Resnick D, Kang HS. Internal derangements of joint - emphasis on MR imaging, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997;555-785.
19. Hulse DA, Shires PK. The meniscus: anatomy, function and treatment. Comp Cont Ed 1983;9:765-775.
20. Dupuis J, Harari J. Cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries in dogs. Comp Cont Ed 1993;15:215-233.
21. Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clinics of N Am 1997, 35:21-44.
22. Vahey TN, Bennett HT, Arlington LE, Shelbourne KD, Ng J. MR imaging of the knee: pseudotear of the lateral meniscus caused by the meniscofemoral ligament. Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:1237-1239.
23. Mirowitz SA. Pitfalls, variants and artifacts in body MR imaging. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996:269-316.
24. Chan WP, Fritz RC, Stenibach LS, Wu CY, Genant HK, Cannon WD. The knee: other pathologic conditions. In: Chan WP, Lang P, Genant HK. MRI of the musculoskeletal system. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:307-350.
25. Bushong SC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996:408-428.
26. Berquist TH, Morin RL. General technical considerations in musculoskeletal MRI. In: Berquist TH. MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:63-98.
27. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, Fuchs MD, Ratner LM, Wirth CR, Hospodar PP. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167: 127-132.
28. Konig H, Sieper J, Wolf K-J. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiol 1990;176:473-477.
29. Drape JL, Thelen P, Silbermann O, et al. MR arthrography of the knee with intravenous administration of Gd-DPTA: 50 cases [abstract]. Radiol 1992;185 (suppl):307.
30. Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH. Complications of arthrography. Radiol 1985;155:605-606.
31. Atilola MA, Pennock PW, Sumner-Sminth G. Evaluation of analytical grade of metrizamide for canine stifle arthrography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984;185:436-439.
32. Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ, Gylys-Morin V, et al. The effect of intraarticular gadolinium-DPTA on synovial membrane and cartilage. Invest Radiol 1990;25:179-183.
33. Tirman PF, Palmer WE, Feller JF. MR arthrography of the shoulder. MRI Clinics of N Am 1997, 5:811-839.
34. Brandser EA, Riley MA, Berbaum KS, El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL. MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament injury: independent value of primary and secondary signs. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:121-126.
35. Hodler J, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D. The cruciate ligaments of the knee: correlation between MR appearance and gross and histologic findings in cadaveric specimens. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:357-360.
36. Roychowdhury S, Fitzgerald SW, Sonin AH, Peduto AJ, Miller FH, Hoff FL. Using MR imaging to diagnose partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of axial images. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1487-1491.
37. Ulmans H, Wimpfheimer O, Haramati N, Applbaum YH, Alder M, Bosco J. Diagnosis of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligaments of the knee: value of MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:893-897.
38. Walker CW, Moore TE. Imaging of the skeletal and soft tissue injuries in and around the knee. Radiol Clinics of N Am 1997, 35:631-654.
39. Irizarry JM, Recht MP. MR imaging of the knee ligaments and the postoperative knee. Radiol Clinics of N Am 1997, 35:45-76.
40. Yao L, Gentili A, Petrus L, Lee JK. Partial ACL rupture: an MR diagnosis? Skel Radiol 1995;24:247-251.
41. Tigges S, Manaster BJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiographic evaluation of the intact, torn, and repaired cruciate ligaments The Radiologist 1997;4:243-256.
42. Moore KW, Read RA. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs - part I. Comp Cont Ed 1996;18:223-234.
43. Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:1016-1019.
44. Scavelli TD, Schrader SC, Matthiesen DT, Skorup DE. Partial rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament of the stifle in dogs: 25 cases (1982-1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:1135-1138.
45. Reinke JD. Cruciate ligament avulsion injury in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1982;18:257-264.