Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 607-611

  Browning, William D ^a   Johnson, William W ^b   Gregory, Paul N ^c  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; TIME;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PATIENT SELECTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034183334     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0234     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bonding amalgam update: 1995. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1995;19(11):1.
2. Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Rothkoff Z, Cardash HS. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7(3):141-3.
3. Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with 4-META liner and copal varnish. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(5):461-6.
4. Saiku JM, St. Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent. Oper Dent 1993;18(5):172-8.
5. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Reduction of postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JADA 1997;128:1661-7.
6. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Postoperative pain following bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22(2):66-71.
7. Santos AC, Meiers JC. Fracture resistance of premolars with MOD amalgam restorations lined with Amalgambond. Oper Dent 1994;19(1):2-6.
8. Della Bona A, Summitt JB. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int 1998;29:95-101.
9. Charlton DG, Murchison DF, Moore BK. Incorporation of adhesive liners in amalgam: effect on compressive strength and creep. Am J Dent 1991;4(4):184-8.
10. Boyer DB, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1994;7(2):91-4.
11. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257-60.
12. Oliveira JP, Cochran MA, Moore BK. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1996;21(3):110-5.
13. Bonilla E, White SN. Fatigue of resinbonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21(3):122-6.
14. Gorucu J, Tiritoglu M, Ozgunaltay G. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of Class II amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:250-4.
15. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. JADA 1997;128:309-14.
16. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: Government Printing Office; 1971. U.S. Public Health Service publication 790-244.
17. Mahler DB, Engle JH, Simms MS, Terkla LG. One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. JADA 1996;127:345-9.
18. Browning WD. Incidence and severity of postoperative pain following routine placement of amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:484-9.