Is extended producer responsibility effective?

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2000, Pages

  Hanisch, Carola ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLASTIC;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTERNET; PACKAGING; POLICY; RECYCLING; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0034177147     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es003229n     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Interim Report according to Article 6.3 (a) of Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste; Rep. 596, 19.11.99; COM, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
2. Electric and Electronic Waste - Coming Regulation in Sweden. www.environ.se (accessed Jan. 2000), press release of Sept. 23, 1999.
3. Heyde, M.; Kremer, M. Recycling and Recovery of Plastics from Packaging in Domestic Waste - An LCA-Type Analysis of Different Strategies; Fraunhofer Institut für Verfahrenstechnik und Verpackung, Eco-Informa Press: Bayreuth, Germany, 1999.
4. Dehoust, G.; Wenem, P.; Fritsche, U.;Wollny, V. Vergleich der rohstofflichen und energetischen Verwertung von Verpackungskunststoffen; Ökoinstitut: Darmstadt/Essen, Germany, Nov. 1999
5. SORTEChnology 3.0, Duales System Deutschland AG; SYSTEC: Köln, Germany, Nov. 1999. www.gruener-punkt. de (accessed Jan. 2000).
6. Annual Report 1998, Packaging Committee, Oct. 1999, Utrecht, www.minvrom.nl/environment/packaging/ (accessed Jan. 2000).
7. Producentansvar för förpackningar - För miljöns skull (summary and conclusion in English); Rep. 4983; Swedish Environmental Protection Agency: Stockholm, 1998.
8. Scarlett, L. Product Take-Back Systems Mandates Reconsidered; Policy Study Number 153; Center for the Study of American Business: St. Louis, MO, Oct. 1999.