Application of fuzzy logic in environmental risk assessment: Some thoughts on fuzzy sets

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 317-332

  Ghomshei, Mory M ^a   Meech, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; FUNCTIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT; FUZZY ARITHMETIC; QUALITATIVE PARAMETER;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 0034175336     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019697200124838     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Binder, S., D. Forney, W. Kaye, and D. Paschal. 1987. Arsenic exposure in children living near a former copper smelter. Bulletin Environmental Contamination 39:114-121.
2. British Columbia Ministry of Environment. 1990. Human exposure reference values. IRF10-9-2.
3. Donato, J. M., E. Barbieri. 1995. Mathematical representation of fuzzy membership functions. IEEE Spectrum, 20(4):290-294.
4. Environment Protection Agency. 1984. Health Assessment Document for Inorganic Arsenic. Washington, D.C.
5. Harris, C. A., and J. A. Meech. 1987. Fuzzy logic: A potential control technique for mineral processing. CIM Bulletin 80(905):51-59.
6. Kaufmann, A. and M. M. Gupta. 1991. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Application. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold 361.
7. Kosco, B. 1994. Fuzzy systems as universal approximators. IEEE Trans. Comp. 43(11):1329-1333.
8. Travis, C. C., S. A. Richter, E. A. C. Crouch, R. Wilson, and E. D. Klema. 1987. Cancer risk management. Environ. Sci. Tech. 21(5):415-420.
9. World Health Organization. 1981. Environmental health criteria 18-ARSENIC. Environmental Health Criteria Series, Geneva, 41-123.