Stochastic resonance in ion channels characterized by information theory

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 4272-4280

  Goychuk, Igor ^a   Hänggi, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ION CHANNEL; POTASSIUM CHANNEL;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; CHANNEL GATING; ENTROPY; IN VITRO STUDY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; METABOLISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICS;

BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; ENTROPY; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; INFORMATION THEORY; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POTASSIUM CHANNELS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

CIRCUIT RESONANCE; CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

ANALYTICAL FORMULAS; CONDUCTANCE FLUCTUATION; INFORMATION GAIN; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; NONSTATIONARY; POTASSIUM CHANNELS; STOCHASTIC RESONANCES; VOLTAGE SIGNALS;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 0034172761     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4272     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998).
2. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998).
3. A. Longtin, A. Bulsara, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 656 (1991).
4. E. Simonotto, M. Riani, C. Seife, M. Roberts, J. Twitty, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1186 (1997).
5. J.J. Collins, T.T. Imhoff, and P. Grigg, Nature (London) 383, 770 (1996).
6. J.E. Levin and J.P. Miller, Nature (London) 380, 165 (1996).
7. B.J. Gluckman, P. So, T.I. Netoff, M.L. Spano, and S.J. Schiff, Chaos 8, 588 (1998).
8. J.K. Douglass, L. Wilkens, E. Pantazelou, and F. Moss, Nature (London) 365, 337 (1993).
9. B. Hille, Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, 2nd ed. (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1992).
10. S.M. Bezrukov and I. Vodyanoy, Nature (London) 378, 362 (1995).
11. S.M. Bezrukov and I. Vodyanoy, Nature (London) 385, 319 (1997)
12. S.M. Bezrukov, Phys. Lett. A 248, 29 (1998).
13. J.J. Collins, C.C. Chow, and T.T. Imhoff, Nature (London) 376, 236 (1995)
14. J.J. CollinsC.C. ChowT.T. ImhoffPhys. Rev. E 52, R3321 (1995)
15. Phys. Rev. EJ.J. Collins, C.C. Chow, A.C. Capela, and T.T. Imhoff, 54, 5575 (1996)
16. Phys. Rev. EC. Heneghan, C.C. Chow, J.J. Collins, T.T. Imhoff, S.B. Lowen, and M.C. Teich, 54, R2228 (1996).
17. M. Stemmler, Network 7, 687 (1996).
18. A.R. Bulsara and A. Zador, Phys. Rev. E 54, R2185 (1996).
19. K. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948)
20. Bell Syst. Tech. J.K. Shannon27, 623 (1948).
21. H.A. Kramers, Physica (Amsterdam) 7, 284 (1940).
22. P. Hänggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990).
23. P. Reimann and P. Hänggi, in Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by L. Schimansky-Geier and T. Pöschel (Springer, Berlin, 1997), Vol. 484, pp. 127–139.
24. D. Sigg, H. Qian, and F. Bezanilla, Biophys. J. 76, 782 (1999).
25. Single-Channel Recording, 2nd ed., edited by B. Sakmann and E. Neher (Plenum, New York, 1995).
26. H. Salman, Y. Soen, and E. Braun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4458 (1996)
27. H. Salman and E. Braun, Phys. Rev. E 56, 852 (1997).
28. S. Marom, H. Salman, V. Lyakhov, and E. Braun, J. Membr. Biol. 154, 267 (1996).
29. B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4854 (1989).
30. A. Neiman, L. Schimansky-Geier, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. E 56, R9 (1997).
31. The problem of extracting these conductance fluctuations from the current recordings in the presence of a time-dependent (e.g., periodic) driving is explained in D. Petracchi , J. Stat. Phys. 70, 393 (1993).
32. N. G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 2nd, enlarged and extended ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).
33. R. L. Stratonovich, Topics in the Theory of Random Noise (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1963), Vol. I.
34. It is remarkable that the permutation invariance of (Formula presented) with respect to the set of probabilities (Formula presented) and the property of additivity, i.e., (Formula presented)— when the probabilities factorize in the composed state space —characterize the Shannon entropy (Formula presented) almost uniquely: any functional satisfying these requirements is a linear combination of the Shannon entropy and the Hartley entropy (Formula presented), with (Formula presented) being the number of (Formula presented) that are different from zero). The additional requirements of (i) (Formula presented) being a continuous function of p, (Formula presented), and (ii) (Formula presented) = (Formula presented)(Formula presented), with (Formula presented) [A. Feinstein, Foundations of Information Theory (Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1958)] determine then the Shannon entropy uniquely.
35. P. Gaspard and X.-J. Wang, Phys. Rep. 235, 292 (1993).
36. F. Rieke, D. Warland, R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).
37. S.P. Strong, R. Koberle, R.R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 197 (1997).
38. The many facets of entropy are beautifully outlined in A. Wherl, Rep. Math. Phys. 30, 119 (1991)
39. also see C. Beck and F. Schlögl, Thermodynamics of Chaotic Systems: an Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
40. The informational capacity of an informational channel is defined as the maximal rate of mutual information obtained for all possible statistical distributions of input signals with a fixed rms amplitude 15.
41. A.L. Hodgkin and A.F. Huxley, J. Physiol. (London) 117, 500 (1952).