Stimulus repetition effects on texture-based visual search by pigeons

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 220-236

  Katz, Jeffrey S ^a,b   Cook, Robert G ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGEONS AND DOVES; RANDOMIZATION; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; COLOR PERCEPTION; COLUMBIDAE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0034170520     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.26.2.220     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beck, J. (1966). Effect of orientation and shape similarity on perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 491-495.
2. Beck, J. (1982). Textural segmentation. In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 285-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234.
4. Blough, D. S. (1989). Odd-item search in pigeons: Display size and transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 14-22.
5. Blough, D. S. (1993). Effects on search speed of probability of target-distractor combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 231-243.
6. Blough, P. M. (1989). Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 358-365.
7. Blough, P. M. (1991). Selective attention and search images in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 292-298.
8. Blough, P. M. (1992). Detectability and choice during visual search: Joint effects of sequential priming and discriminability. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 293-300.
9. Blough, P. M. (1996). Priming during multiple-target search: The cumulative effects of relative target frequency. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 394-400.
10. Blough, P. M., & Lacourse, D. M. (1994). Sequential priming in visual search: Contributions of stimulus-driven facilitation and learned expectancies. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 275-281.
11. Bond, A. B. (1983). Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: The attention threshold hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 292-306.
12. Bond, A. B., & Riley, D. (1991). Searching image in the pigeon: A test of three hypothetical mechanisms. Ethology, 87, 203-224.
13. Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping the pigeon's key peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1-8.
14. Cook, R. G. (1992a). Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 354-363.
15. Cook, R. G. (1992b). The acquisition and transfer of texture visual discriminations by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 341-353.
16. Cook, R. G. (1992c). The visual perception and processing of textures by pigeons. In W. K. Honig & G. Fetterman (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 279-299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Cook, R. G. (1993a). Gestalt contributions to visual texture discriminations by pigeons. In T. Zentall (Ed.), Animal cognition: A tribute to Donald A. Riley (pp. 251-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Cook, R. G. (1993b). The experimental analysis of cognition in animals. Psychological Science, 4, 174-178.
19. Cook, R. G. (in press). The comparative psychology of avian visual cognition. Current Direction in Psychological Science.
20. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, K. K., & Cavoto, B. R. (1995). Same/different texture discrimination and concept learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 253-260.
21. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, K. K., & Cavoto, B. R. (1996). Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 150-167.
22. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, B. R., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, K. K. (1997). Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 390-400.
23. Cook, R. G., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, B. R. (1997). Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 417-433.
24. Cook, R. G., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, B. R. (1998). Processes of visual cognition in the pigeon. In S. Soraci & B. McIlvane (Eds.), Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning: Vol. 1. A survey of research approaches. Greenwich, CT:Ablex.
25. Jenkins, H. M., & Sainsbury, R. S. (1970). Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive or negative trials. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 239-273). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26. Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91-97.
27. Kendrick, D. F., Wright, A. A., & Cook, R. G. (1990). On the role of memory in concept learning by pigeons. Psychological Record, 40, 359-371.
28. Langley, C. M. (1996). Search images: Selective attention to specific visual features of prey. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 152-163.
29. Langley, C. M., Riley, D. A., Bond, A. B., & Goel, N. (1996). Visual search for natural grains in pigeons (Columba livia): Search images and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 139-151.
30. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
31. Pietrewicz, A. T., & Kamil, A. C. (1979, June 22). Search image formation in the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Science, 204, 1332-1333.
32. Plaisted, K. (1997). The effect of interstimulus interval on the discrimination of cryptic targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 248-259.
33. Plaisted, K. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: Implications for the search image and search rate hypotheses. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1219-1232.
34. QuickBasic 7.0 [Computer software]. (1989). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
35. Reid, P. J., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1992). Detection of cryptic prey: Search image or search rate? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 273-286.
36. Santiago, H. C., & Wright, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory: Same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 498-512.
37. Tinbergen, N. (1960). The natural control of insects in pine woods: I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Archives Neelandaises de Zoologie, 13, 265-343.
38. Vreven, D., & Blough, P. M. (1998). Searching for one or many targets: Effects of extended experience on the runs advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 98-105.
39. Wasserman, E. A., Hugart, J. A., & Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248-252.
40. Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., Rivera, J. J., Sands, S. F., & Delius, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 436-444.
41. Xgraf 5.0 [Computer software]. (1989). Pittsburgh, PA: Komputerwerk.