Orientation tuning of shape from shading

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 557-568

  Symons, Lawrence A ^a   Cuddy, Faye ^a   Humphrey, Keith ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034170172     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212107     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AKS, D. J., & ENNS, J. T. (1992). Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 63-74.
2. BECK, J., PRAZDNY, K., & ROSENFELD, A. (1983). A theory of textural segmentation. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
3. BERBAUM, K., BEVER, T., & CHUNG, C. (1983). Light source position in the perception of object shape. Perception, 12, 411-415.
4. BERBAUM, K., THARP, D., & MROCZEK, K. (1983). Depth perception of surfaces in pictures: Looking for conventions of depiction in Pandora's box. Perception, 12, 5-20.
5. BRAUN, J. (1993). Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a "texton." Spatial Vision, 7, 311-322.
6. BREWSTER, D. (1847). On the conversion of relief by inverted vision. Edinburgh Philosophical Transactions, 15, 657.
7. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & MALLOT, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 1749-1758.
8. ENNS, J. T., OCHS, E. P., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). VSearch: Macintosh software for experiments in visual search. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 118-122.
9. GREGORY, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. HOWARD, I. R. BERGSTRÖM, S. S., & OHMI, M. (1990). Shape from shading in different frames of reference. Perception, 19, 523-530.
11. HUMPHREY, G. K., GOODALE, M. A., BOWEN, C. V., GATE J. S., VILIS, T., RUTT, B. K., & MENON, R. S. (1997). Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas. Current Biology, 7, 144-147.
12. HUMPHREY, G. K., SYMONS, L. A., HERBERT, A. M., & GOODALE, M. A. (1996). A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioural Brain Research, 76, 117-125.
13. JULESZ, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends in Neurosciences, 7, 41-45.
14. KLEFFNER, D. A., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 18-36.
15. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American, 259, 76-83.
16. SUN, J., & PERONA, P. (1996a). Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system. Nature, 379, 165-168.
17. SUN, J. Y., & PERONA, P. (1996b). Where is the sun? Nature Neuroscience, 1, 183-184.
18. TODD, J. T., & MINGOLLA, E. (1983). Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 583-595.
19. TREISMAN, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114-126.
20. TROJE, N. F. & SYMONS, L. A. (1998). Search asymmetries for shaded disks are not present for shaded faces. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, 790.
21. WENDEROTH, P., & HICKEY, N. (1993). Object and head orientation effects on symmetry perception defined by shape from shading. Perception, 22, 1121-1130.