Classification of occlusion reconsidered

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 169-174

  Brin, I ^a,b   Weinberger, T ^a   Ben Chorin, E ^c  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PILOT PROJECTS; STATISTICS; STUDENTS, DENTAL;

EID: 0034167339     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/22.2.169     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abramson J H 1990 Survey methods in community medicine. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p. 148
2. Ackerman J L, Proffit W R 1969 The characteristics of malocclusion: a modern approach to classification and diagnosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 56: 443-454
3. Baumrind S, Korn E L, Boyd R L, Maxwell R 1996 The decision to extract. Part 1: interclinician agreement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109: 297-309
4. Bright Wilson E Jr 1952 An introduction to scientific research. McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Case C S 1905 Principles of occlusion and dentofacial relation. Dental Items of Interest 27: 489-527
6. Dewey M 1935 Practical orthodontia, 5th edn. C V Mosby, St Louis
7. Dockrell R 1952 Classifying aetiology of malocclusion. Dental Record 72: 25-31
8. Du S Q, Rinchuse D J, Zullo T G, Rinchuse D J 1998 Reliability of three methods of occlusion classification. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 463-470
9. Gottlieb E L 1996 The doctor's dilemma (Editorial). Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 30: 9-10
10. Gottlieb E L 1997 Lessons learned (Editorial). Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 31: 8-9
11. Grainger R M 1960-1961 Malocclusions severity estimate. Progress Report, Series 6, Burlington Orthodontic Research Centre, pp. 9-11
12. Gravely J F, Johnson O B 1974 Angle's classification of malocclusion: an assessment of reliability. British Journal of Orthodontics 1: 79-86
13. Hans M G, Broadbent B H, Nelson S S 1994 The Broadbent-Bolton Study - past, present and future. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 105: 598-603
14. Katz M I 1992a Angle's classification revisited 1: is current use reliable? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 173-179
15. Katz M I 1992b Angle's classification revisited 2: a modified Angle classification. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 277-284
16. Katz M I, Sinkford J C, Sanders C F 1990 The 100-year dilemma: what is a normal occlusion and how is malocclusion classified? Quintessence International 21: 407-414
17. Shaw W C, Richmond S, O'Brien K D, Brock P, Stephens C D 1991 Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. British Dental Journal 170: 107-112
18. Summers C J 1971 The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 552-567
19. Van Kirk L K, Pennell E H 1959 Assessment of malocclusion in population groups. American Journal of Orthodontics 45: 752-768
20. Williams A C, Stephens C D 1992 A modification to the incisor classification of malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics 19: 127-130