Contextual and strategic knowledge in the acquisition of design expertise

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 113-136

  Eteläpelto, Anneli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Contextual knowledge; Design expertise; Professional learning; Project learning; Strategic knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034165514     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00014-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Achtenhagen, F. (1995). Fusing experience and theory - Sociopolitical and cognitive issues. Learning and Instruction, 5, 409-417.
2. Adelson, B. (1981). Problem-solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory and Cognition, 9, 422-433.
3. Adelson, B., & Soloway, E. (1985). The role of domain experience in software design. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, SE-11, 1351-1360.
4. Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. (1995). Structured and opportunistic processing in design: A critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 131-151.
5. Bateson, A. G., Alexander, R. A., & Murphy, M. D. (1987). Cognitive processing differences between novice and expert computer programmers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 26, 649-660.
6. Batra, D., & Davis, J. G. (1992). Conceptual data modelling in database design: Similarities and differences between expert and novice designers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37, 83-101.
7. Benner, P. (1984). From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing Ourselves - An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
9. Berliner, D. C. (1992). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J.-L. Patry, Effective and Responsible Teaching - The New Synthesis (pp. 227-248). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1980). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bromme, R., & Tillema, H. (1995). Fusing experience and theory: The structure of professional knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 5, 261-268.
12. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 3-35.
13. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6 (3), 271-315.
14. Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (1992). Creativity in Design: The Role of Domain Knowledge in Designing. Utrecht: Lemma BV.
15. Davies, S. P. (1991). Characterizing the program design activity: Neither strictly top-down nor globally opportunistic. Behaviour and Information Technology, 10, 173-190.
16. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and the Expertise of in the Era of the Computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
17. Eteläpelto, A. (1994). Work experience and the development of expertise. In W. J. Nijhof, & J. N. Streumer, Flexibility and Training in Vocational Education (pp. 319-341). Utrecht: Lemma BV.
18. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395-429.
19. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
20. Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical Longitudinal Data: Log-linear Panel, Trend, and Cohort Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Jeffries, R., Turner, A. A., Polson, P. G., & Atwood, M. E. (1981). The processes involved in designing software. In J. R. Anderson, Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition (pp. 255-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Koubeck, R. J., & Salvendy, G. (1991). Cognitive performance of super-experts on computer program modification task. Ergonomics, 34, 2095-2112.
23. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interation (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Lee, A., & Pennington, N. (1994). The effects of paradigm on cognitive activities in design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 577-601.
25. Moran, T. P. (1994). Introduction to this special issue on context in design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 37-135.
26. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
27. Newman, S. E. (1994). Interpretation, negotiation, and practice in system design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 94-98.
28. Norman, D. A. (1993). Cognition in the head and in the world: An introduction to the special issue on situated action. Cognitive Science, 17, 1-6.
29. Rambow, R., & Bromme, R. (1995). Implicit psychological concepts in architects' knowledge - how large is a large room? Learning and Instruction, 5, 337-356.
30. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 79-91.
31. Saariluoma, P. (1997). Foundation Analysis: Presuppositions in Experimental Psychology. London: Routledge.
32. Säljö, R. (1996). Mental and physical artefacts in cognitive practices. In P. Reiman, & H. Spada, Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science (pp. 83-96). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
33. Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 205-221.
34. Schraagen, J. M. (1993). How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design. Cognitive Science, 17, 285-309.
35. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 145-180.
37. Soloway, E., Adelson, B., & Ehrlich, K. (1988). Knowledge and processes in the comprehension of computer programs. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr, The Nature of Expertise (pp. 185-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Sonnentag, S. (1995). Excellent software professionals: Experience, work activities, and perception by peers. Behaviour and Information Technology, 14 (5), 589-599.
39. Tillema, H. H. (1995). Changing the professional knowledge and belief of teachers: A training study. Learning and Instruction, 5, 291-318.
40. Tourunen, E. (1992). Educating reflective system designers by using the experiential learning model. In B. Z. Barta, A. Goh, & L. Lim, Professional Development of Information Technology Professionals (IFIP Transactions A-17) (pp. 113-120). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. Von der Weth, R., & Frankenberg, E. (1995). Strategies, competence and style-problem - Solving in engineering design. Learning and Instruction, 5, 357-384.
42. Winograd, T. (1995). From programming environments to environments for designing. Communications of the ACM, 38 (6), 65-74.
43. Visser, W., & Hoc, J.-M. (1990). Expert software design strategies. In J.-M. Hoc, T. C. R. Green, R. Samurcay, & D. Gilmore, Psychology of Programming. London: Academic Press.
44. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.