Concepts, the lexicon and acquisition: Fodor's new challenge

Mind and Language

Volumn 15, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 319-326

  Landau, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034165184     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00136     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bloom, P. 1996: Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29.
2. Carey, S. 1982: Semantic development: The state of the art. In E. Wanner and L.R. Gleitman (eds), Language acquisition: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Fodor, J.A. 1981: The present status of the innateness controversy. In J.A. Fodor, Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Gelman, S.A. and Wellman, H. 1991: Insides and essences: early understanding of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213-44.
5. Gleitman, L.R. 1990: The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1, 1-55.
6. Johnson, M. 1997: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7. Landau, B. and Gleitman, L.R. 1985: Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Landau, B., Smith, L.B. and Jones, S. 1998: Object perception and object naming in early development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 19-24.
9. Margolis, E. 1999: How to acquire a concept. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds), Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 549-68.
10. Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. 1999: Concepts and cognitive science. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3-81.