Immunocytochemical techniques to investigate the pathogenesis of infectious micro-organisms and the concurrent immune response of the host

Developmental and Comparative Immunology

Volumn 24, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 141-151

  Jeurissen, Suzan H M ^a   Claassen, Eric ^b   Boonstra Blom, Anneke G ^a   Vervelde, Lonneke ^c   Marga Janse, E ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alkaline phosphatase; Chicken; Horseradish peroxidase; Immunocytochemical staining; In situ detection; Monoclonal antibody; galactosidase

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; AVIAN LYMPHOMATOSIS HERPETOVIRUS; CIRCOVIRIDAE; EIMERIA TENELLA; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOVIRUS; REVIEW;

ANIMALIA; ARMORACIA RUSTICANA; AVES; CHICKEN ANEMIA VIRUS; CIRCOVIRIDAE; EIMERIA TENELLA; GALLID HERPESVIRUS 2; GALLUS GALLUS; HERPETOVIRUS; INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS; MAMMALIA; MARDIVIRUS; REOVIRUS SP.;

EID: 0034163366     PISSN: 0145305X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00069-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Köhler G., Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 256:1975;495-497.
2. Van der Loos C., Van den Oord J., Das P., Houthoff H.J. Use of commercially available antibodies for immunoenzyme double staining. Histochem. J. 20:1988;409-413.
3. Graham R.C., Lundholm U., Karnovsky J.N. Cytochemical demonstration of peroxidase activity with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 13:1965;150-152.
4. Burstone M.S. Histochemical comparison of naphthol-phosphates for the demonstration of phosphatases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 20:1958;601-606.
5. Bondi A., Chieregatti G., Eusebi V., Fulcheri E., Bussolati G. The use of β-galactosidase as a tracer in immunocytochemistry. Histochemistry. 76:1982;153-158.
6. Claassen E., Jeurissen S.H.M. A step by step guide to in situ immune response analysis of lymphoid tissues by immunohistochemical methods. Herzenberg L.A., Weir D.M., Herzenberg L.A., Blackwell C. Weir's handbook of experimental immunology. vol. IV:1996;204.1-204.12 Blackwell Science, Cambridge MA. (Chapter 204).
7. Noteborn M.H.M., de Boer G.F., van Roozelaar D.J., Karreman C., Kranenburg O., Vos J.G., Jeurissen S.H.M., Hoeben R.C., Zantma A., Koch G., van Ormondt H., van der Eb A.L. Characterization of cloned chicken anemia virus DNA that contains all elements for the infectious replication cycle. J. Virol. 65:1991;3131-3139.
8. Jeurissen S.H.M., Scholten R., Hilgers L.Th., Pol J.M.A., de Boer G.F. In situ detection by monoclonal antibody D-35.1 of cells infected with Marek's disease virus that interact with splenic ellipsoid-associated reticulum cells. Avian Dis. 33:1989;657-663.
9. Jeurissen S.H.M., Janse E.M., Van Roozelaar D.J., Koch G., de Boer G.F. Susceptibility of thymocytes for infection by chicken anemia virus is related to pre- and post-hatching development. Dev. Immunol. 2:1992;123-129.
10. Scholten R., Hilgers L.A.Th., Jeurissen S.H.M., Westrate M.W. Detection of Marek's disease virus antigen in chickens by a novel immunoassay. J. Virol. Meth. 27:1990;221-229.
11. Jeurissen S.H.M., Janse E.M., Ekino S., Nieuwenhuis P., Koch G., de Boer G.F. Monoclonal antibodies as probes for defining cellular subsets in the bone marrow, thymus, bursa of Fabricius, and spleen of the chicken. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 19:1988;225-238.
12. Fahey K.J., McWaters P., Brown M.A., Erny K., Murphy V.J., Hewish D.R. Virus-neutralizing and passively protective monoclonal antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus of chickens. Avian Dis. 35:1991;365-373.
13. Jeurissen S.H.M., Janse E.M., Lehrbach P.R., Haddad E.E., Avakian A., Whitfill C.E. The working mechanism of an immune complex vaccine that protects chickens against infectious bursal disease. Immunology. 95:1998;494-500.
14. Chen C.H., Ager L.L., Gartland G.L., Cooper M.D. Identification of a T3/T cell receptor complex in chickens. J. Exp. Med. 164:1986;375-380.
15. Jeurissen S.H.M., Janse E.M., Vermeulen A.N. Lymphoid and non-lymphoid cells in the caecal mucosa of naive and immune chickens related to the development of Eimeria tenella. Ivore P. Coccidia and intestinal coccidiomorphs. 1989;551-556 INRA, Paris.
16. Vervelde L., Vermeulen A.N., Jeurissen S.H.M. In situ characterization of leucocyte subpopulations after infection with Eimeria tenella in chickens. Parasite Immunol. 18:1996;247-256.
17. Vervelde L., Jeurissen S.H.M. Postnatal development of intra-epithelial leucocytes in the chicken digestive tract: phenotypical characterization in situ. Cell Tissue Res. 274:1993;295-301.
18. Vervelde L., Vermeulen A.N., Jeurissen S.H.M. Eimeria tenella sporozoites rarely enter leucocytes in the cecal epithelium of the chicken (Gallus domesticus). Exp. Parasitol. 81:1995;29-38.
19. Vervelde L., Vermeulen A.N., Jeurissen S.H.M. In situ immunocytochemical detection of cells containing antibodies specific for Eimeria tenella antigens. J. Immunol. Methods. 151:1992;191-199.