Effects of stand composition and thinning in mixed-species forests: A modeling approach applied to Douglas-fir and beech

Tree Physiology

Volumn 20, Issue 5-6, 2000, Pages 399-406

  Bartelink, H H ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Distance dependency; Growth; Management; Mixed stands; Productivity; Replacement series; Simulation; Yield

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH MODELING; MIXED FOREST; STAND STRUCTURE; THINNING;

ABIES; FAGUS; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 0034163344     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/20.5-6.399     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Assmann, E. 1961. Waldertragskunde. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München, Bonn, Wien, 490 p.
2. Bartelink, H.H. 1997. Radiation interception by forest trees: a simulation approach. Ecol. Model. 105:213-225.
3. Bartelink, H.H. 1998a. A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. Tree Physiol. 18:91-101.
4. Bartelink, H.H. 1998b. Simulation of growth and competition in mixed stands of Douglas-fir and beech. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 222 p.
5. Bartelink, H.H., K. Kramer and G.M.J. Mohren. 1997. Applicability of the radiation-use efficiency concept for simulating growth of monospecies and mixed forest stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 88:169-179.
6. Burkhart, H.E. and C. Tham. 1992. Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed-species stands. In The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees. Eds. M.G.R. Cannell, D.C. Malcolm and P.A. Robertson. Proc. IUFRO/BES Symp., British Ecological Society. Blackwells, Oxford, 312 p.
7. Cannell, M.G.R. 1982. World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic Press, London, New York, 391 p.
8. Cannell, M.G.R. 1989. Physiological basis of wood production: a review. Scand. J. For. Res. 4:459-490.
9. Cannell, M.G.R. and R.C. Dewar. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Adv. Ecol.Res. 25:59-104.
10. de Wit, C.T. 1960. On competition. Versl.Landbouwk.Onderz. No. 66.8. Institute for biological and chemical research on field crops and herbage. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 82 p.
11. Holmes, M.J. and D.D. Reed. 1991. Competition indices for mixed species northern hardwoods. For. Sci. 37:1338-1349.
12. Jansen, J.J., J. Sevenster and P. Faber. 1996. Opbrengsttabellen voor belangrijke boomsoorten in Nederland. Hinkeloord Report No. 17/ IBN-rapport 221, Dept of Forestry, Wageningen Agricultural Univ., 198 p.
13. Kelty, M.J. 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Eds. M.J. Kelty, B.C. Larson and C.D. Oliver. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 287 p.
14. Kelty, M.J. and I.R. Cameron. 1994. Ecological principles of production differences between monocultures and mixtures. In Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements, Results, and Models. Eds. M.E. Pinto da Costa and T. Preuhsler. Proc. Symp. IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal, pp 15-29.
15. Kennel, R. 1965. Untersuchungen über die Leistung von Fichte und Buche im Rein- und Mischbestand. Allg. Forst. Jagdztg. 136:149-161, 173-189.
16. Kramer, K. 1996. Phenology and growth of European trees in relation to climate change. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural Univ., 210 p.
17. Landsberg, J.J., 1986. Physiological ecology of forest production. Academic Press, New York, 202 p.
18. Lavigne, M.B. 1992. Exploring the possibilities of developing a physiological model of mixed stands. In The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Eds. M.J. Kelty, B.C. Larson and C.D. Oliver. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 287 p.
19. Mäkelä, A. 1986. Implications of the pipe-model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. J. Theor. Biol. 123:103-120.
20. Mäkelä, A. and P. Hari. 1986. Stand growth model based on carbon uptake and allocation in individual trees. Ecol. Model. 33:205-229.
21. Mohren, G.M.J. 1987. Simulation of forest growth, applied to Douglas-fir stands in the Netherlands. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, 184 p.
22. Monteith, J.L. 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. pp 277-294.
23. Nikinmaa, E. 1992. Analysis of the growth of Scots pine; matching structure with function. Acta For. Fenn. 235:1-68.
24. Nusslein, S. 1993. Fichten-Reinbestand und Fichten-BuchenMischbestand im Leistungsvergleich. Allg. Forstztg. 48:682-684.
25. Pretzsch, H. 1992. Konzeption und Konstruktion von Wuchsmodellen für Rein- und Mischbestände. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München Nr. 115, Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der Bayerischen Forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt, 332 p.
26. Schoonderwoerd, H. and W.P. Daamen. 1995. De bijgroei van bos in Nederland. Ned. Bosbouw Tijdschr. 67:16-22.
27. Spitters, C.J.T., H.A.J.M. Toussaint and J. Goudriaan. 1986. Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modelling canopy photosynthesis I. Components of incoming radiation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38:217-229.
28. Valentine, H.T. 1985. Tree-growth models: derivations employing the pipe-model theory. J. Theor. Biol. 117:579-585.
29. van Kraalingen, D.W.G. 1989. A three-dimensional light model for crop canopies. Internal Report 17, Dept. of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen Agricultural Univ., 35 p.
30. Wiedemann, E. 1950. Ertrachskundliche und waldbauliche Grundlagen der Forstwissenschaft. J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt, 346 p.
31. Zimmermann, H. 1988. Zur Mischung von Buche und Fichte auf Mittelgebirgsstandorten in Hessen. Forst. Holz. 43:103-106.