Connectance in Sorghum development: Beyond the genotype-phenotype duality

BioSystems

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-11

  Amzallag, G N ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Connectance; Developmental network; Morphogenesis; Phenotypic plasticity; Self organization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLASTICITY; REPRODUCTION;

SORGHUM BICOLOR;

EID: 0034161508     PISSN: 03032647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0303-2647(00)00068-X     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alberch P. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. Am. Zool. 20:1980;653-667.
2. Amzallag G.N. Induced modifications in reproductive traits of salt-treated plants of Sorghum bicolor. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 46:1998;1-8.
3. Amzallag G.N. Adaptive nature of the transition phases in development: the case of Sorghum bicolor. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1999;1035-1041.
4. Amzallag, G.N., 1999b. Individuation on Sorghum bicolor: A self-organized process involved in physiological adaptation to salinity. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1389-1399.
5. Amzallag G.N. Regulation of growth: the meristem network approach. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1999;483-493.
6. Amzallag G.N. Plant evolution: towards an adaptive theory. Lerner H.R. Plant Response to Stresses: From Hormone to Genome Reorganization. 1999;171-245 Marcel Dekker, New York.
7. Amzallag G.N., Nachmias A., Lerner H.R. Influence of the mode of salinization on the reproductive traits of field-grown progeny in Sorghum bicolor. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 46:1998;9-16.
8. Atchley W. Developmental quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogenies. Evolution. 41:1987;316-330.
9. Barton N.H., Turelli M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu. Rev. Genet. 23:1989;337-370.
10. Berg R.L. A general evolutionary principle underlying the origin of developmental homeostasis. Am. Nat. 93:1959;103-105.
11. Berg R.L. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution. 14:1960;171-180.
12. von Bertalanffy L. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science. 111:1950;23-29.
13. Bradshaw A.D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Adv. Genet. 13:1965;115-155.
14. Chauvet G.A. Hierarchical functional organization of formal biological systems: a dynamical approach. I. The increase in complexity by self-association increases the domain of stability of a biological system. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 339:1993;425-444.
15. Cheverud J.M. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution. 42:1988;958-968.
16. Conrad M. Adaptability. 1983;Plenum, New York.
17. Conrad M. The geometry of evolution. BioSystems. 24:1990;61-81.
18. Csaba G. Phylogeny and ontogeny of chemical signaling: origin and development of hormone receptors. Int. Rev. Cytol. 155:1994;1-48.
19. Gardner M.R., Ashby W.R. Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature. 228:1970;784.
20. Gebhardt-Henrich S.G., van Noordwijk A.J. Nestling growth in the great tit. 1. Heritability estimates under different environmental conditions. J. Evol. Biol. 3:1991;341-362.
21. Grant V. Character coherence in natural hybrid populations in plants. Bot. Gaz. 140:1979;443-448.
22. Hiett P.J. Characterizing critical rules at the edge of chaos. BioSystems. 49:1999;127-142.
23. Hueter C.A. Constancy of the pentamerous corolla phenotype in natural populations of Linanthus. Evolution. 23:1969;572-588.
24. Ito K., Gunji Y.P. Self-organized marginal stability resulting from inconsistency between fuzzy logic and deterministic logic: an application to biological systems. BioSystems. 41:1997;179-190.
25. Larsson K. Inheritance of body size in the barnacle goose under different environmental conditions. J. Evol. Biol. 6:1993;195-208.
26. Lewontin R.C. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 26:1974;400-411.
27. Matsuno K. Dynamics of time and information in dynamic time. BioSystems. 46:1998;57-71.
28. May R.M. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature. 238:1972;413-414.
29. Moran G.F., Marshall D.R., Muller W.J. Phenotypic variation and plasticity in the colonizing species Xanthium strumarum L. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 34:1981;639-648.
30. Price T., Schluter D. On the low heritability of life-history traits. Evolution. 45:1991;853-861.
31. Prigogine I., Wiame J.M. Biologie et thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles. Experentia. 2:1946;451-453.
32. Riska B. Some models for development, growth and morphometric correlations. Evolution. 40:1986;1303-1311.
33. Seligmann H., Amzallag G.N. Adaptive determinism during salt-adaptation in Sorghum bicolor. BioSystems. 36:1995;71-77.
34. Sherry R.A., Lord E.M. Developmental stability in flowers of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 9:1996;911-930.
35. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry. 2nd edn:1981;W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
36. Stearns S.C., Kawecki T.J. Fitness sensitivity and the canalization of life-history traits. Evolution. 48:1994;1438-1450.
37. Sultan S.E. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44:1987;363-383.
38. Sultan S.E. Phenotypic plasticity and the neo-darwinian legacy. Evol. Trends Plants. 6:1992;61-71.
39. Trewavas A. Sensitivity and sensory adaptation in growth substance responses. Hoad G.V. et al. Hormone Action in Plant Development. 1987;19-37 Butterworth, London.
40. Trewavas A. The importance of individuality. Lerner H.R. Plant Response to Stress: From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization. 1999;27-42 Marcel Dekker, New York.
41. Trewavas A.J., Malho R. Signal perception and transduction: the origin of the phenotype. Plant Cell. 9:1997;1181-1195.
42. Waddington C.H. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature. 150:1942;563-565.
43. Warburton F.E. Feedback in development and its evolutionary significance. Am. Nat. 89:1955;129-140.
44. Willis J.H., Coyne J.A., Kirkpatrick M. Can one predict the evolution of quantitative characters without genetics? Evolution. 45:1991;441-444.