The best interests of the child in assisted human reproduction: The interplay between the state, professionals, and parents

Politics and the Life Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 33-44

  Daniels, Ken R ^a   Blyth, Eric ^b   Hall, Darrel ^a   Hanson, Kathy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PARENT; POLICY; SOCIAL CHANGE;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; PARENTS; PUBLIC POLICY; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SOCIAL CHANGE;

EID: 0034160748     PISSN: 07309384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0730938400008881     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Andrews, K. (1990). "Regulating Embryo Experimentation: The Victorian Experience." In H. Caton (ed.), Trends in Biomedical Regulation. Sydney: Butterworths.
2. Asche, A. (1985). Creating Children: Report of the Family Law Council of Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
3. Bederman, G. (1995). Manliness and Civilisation: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (1993). "Not Ready for Openness: Donor Insemination in Poland." Politics and the Life Sciences 12:173-74.
5. Blyth, E. (1995). "The United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and the Welfare of the Child: A Critique." International Journal of Children's Rights 3:417-38.
6. Bonduelle, M. et al. (1999). "Seven Years of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and Follow Up of 1987 Subsequent Children." Human Reproduction 14 (supp. 1):243-64.
7. Botting, B., A. MacFarlane, and F. Price, eds. (1990). Three, Four and More: A Study of Triplet and Higher Order Births. London: HMSO.
8. Haimes, E. (1998). "The Making of the DI Child: Changing Representations of People Conceived through Donor Insemination." In K. Daniels and E. Haimes (eds.), Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hardie-Boys, M. (1981). Walker vs Walker and Harrison. New Zealand Recent Law, p. 257.
10. Hinsliff, G. (1996). Fertility Clinics Are Ignoring Guidelines on Single Mothers. Daily Mail (May 2):20.
11. Hunt, J. (1996). "PROGAR Consultation Day." Journal of Fertility Counselling 3 (2):7.
12. King's Fund Centre (1991). Counselling for Regulated Infertility Treatments: The Report of the Counselling Committee. London: King's Fund Centre.
13. Knight, J. (1996). House of Commons Debates. Hansard. October 30, col. 590.