An appraisal of Computed Tomography pelvimetry in patients with previous caesarean section

Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 260-264

  Abu Ghazzeh, Y M ^a   Barqawi, R ^a  

^a Prince Hashim Al Hussein Hospital   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DELIVERY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PARITY; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PARITY; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 0034158479     PISSN: 10203397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Radomsky JW, Radomsky NA. Efficacy of pelvimetry. Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiology, 1980, 31(1):43-4.
2. Laube DW, Varner MW, Cruikshank DP. A prospective evaluation of X-ray pelvimetry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1981, 246:2187-8
3. Parsons MT, Spellacy WN. Prospective randomized study of X-ray pelvimetry in the primigravida. Obstetrics and gynecology, 1985, 66:76-9.
4. Morrison JJ et al. Obstetric pelvimetry in the UK: an appraisal of current practice. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1995, 102:748-50.
5. Krishnamurthy S et al. The role of post-natal X-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1991, 98:716-8.
6. Thubisi M et al. Vaginal delivery after previoius caesarean section: is X-ray pelvimetry necessary? British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1993, 100:421-4
7. Wade JP. Accuracy of pelvimetry measurements on CT scanners. British journal of radiology, 1992, 65:261-3.
8. Nasrat H, Warda A. X-ray pelvimetry reappraisal. Clinical and experimental obstetrics and gynecology, 1991, 27-33.
9. Federle MP et al. Pelvimetry by digital radiography: a low-dose examination. Radiology, 1982, 143:733-5.
10. Akiel AS et al. Low-dose CT pelvimetry in Saudi females. Saudi medical journal, 1988, 9:173-81.
11. English J, Acoair K. Normal pelvic dimensions for Saudi women in Tabuk obtained by computed tomography pelvimetry. Annals of Saudi medicine, 1995, 15:236-9.
12. Suramo I et al. A low-dose CT pelvimetry. British journal of radiology, 1984, 57:35-7.
13. Adam P et al. Pelvimetry by digital radiography. Clinical radiology, 1985, 36:237-30.
14. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Washington DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995 (Committee Opinion No. 158).
15. Rates of vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Washington DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1996 (Committee Opinion No. 179).
16. Vaginal birth. Ottawa, Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, 1993 (Policy Statement, No. 23).