|
|
|
Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 211-214
|
|
Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sealant adhesion
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANTICARIES AGENT;
BICARBONATE;
DETERGENT;
FISSURE SEALANT;
FLUORIDE;
PUMICE;
SILICATE;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CARE;
ENAMEL;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MOLAR TOOTH;
OINTMENT;
POWDER;
PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY;
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;
SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
TIME;
ULTRASTRUCTURE;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CARIOSTATIC AGENTS;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS;
DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS;
DETERGENTS;
FLUORIDES;
HUMANS;
MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;
MOLAR, THIRD;
OINTMENTS;
PHARMACEUTICAL SOLUTIONS;
PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS;
POWDERS;
SILICATES;
SODIUM BICARBONATE;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
TIME FACTORS;
|
|
EID: 0034157424
PISSN: 10534628
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (16)
|
|
References (2)
|
