|
Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 150-156
|
A comparison of parenteral and electronic dental anesthesia during operative procedures in children.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
LIDOCAINE;
LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;
ARTICLE;
CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
CHILD;
CHILD BEHAVIOR;
CLASSIFICATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DECIDUOUS TOOTH;
DENTAL ANESTHESIA;
DENTAL SURGERY;
ELECTRODE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
LOCAL ANESTHESIA;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MOLAR TOOTH;
NONPARAMETRIC TEST;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PAIN;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATHOLOGY;
PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION;
ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED;
ANESTHESIA, DENTAL;
ANESTHESIA, LOCAL;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
CHILD;
CHILD BEHAVIOR;
DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT;
ELECTRODES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LIDOCAINE;
MALE;
MOLAR;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PAIN;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;
TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRIC NERVE STIMULATION;
|
EID: 0034156930
PISSN: 03636771
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|