Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine tarsus: normal anatomy

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 131-141

  Blaik, Margaret A ^a   Hanson, R Reid ^a   Kincaid, Steven A ^a   Hathcock, John T ^a   Hudson, Judith A ^a   Baird, Debra K ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Equine; Hock; Horse; Low field magnetic resonance imaging; Tarsus

Indexed keywords

EQUIDAE; EQUUS CABALLUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; FEMALE; HINDLIMB; HISTOLOGY; HOOF AND CLAW; HORSE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; FEMALE; HINDLIMB; HOOF AND CLAW; HORSES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; TARSUS, ANIMAL;

EID: 0034154113     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01466.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Rose RJ, Hodgson DR. Hindlimb Abnormalities. In Rose and Hodgson. Manual of Equine Practice. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1993:112.
2. Matrinelli MJ, Baker GJ, Clarkson RB, Eurell JC, Pijanowsld GJ, Kuriashkin IV. Magnetic resonance imaging of degenerative joint disease in a horse: a comparison to other diagnostic techniques. Equine Vet J 1996;28:410-415.
3. Crass JR, Genovese RL, Render JA, Bellon EM. Magnetic resonance, ultrasound and histopathologic correlation of acute and healing equine tendon injuries. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1992;33:210-216.
4. Peterfy CG, Linares R, Steinbach LS. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1994;32:291-311.
5. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, Frewin J, Wille KH. The anatomy of the domestic animals Vol I, The locomotor system of the domestic mammals. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
6. th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975.
7. th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975.
8. th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975.
9. Baird DK, Hathcock JT, Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the canine stifle joint: normal anatomy. Vet Radiol & Ultrasound 1998;39:87-97.
10. Rothschild PA, Domesek JM, Kaufman L et al. MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet. Radiology 1990;175:775-778.
11. Rothschild PA, Winkler ML, Gronemeyer DHW, Kaufman L, D'Amour P. Midfield and low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Top Magn Reson Imag 1988;1:11-23.
12. Kramer DM, Guzman RJ, Carlson JW, Crooks LE, Kaufman L. Physics of thin-section MR imaging at low field strength. Radiology 1989; 173:541-544.
13. Chakers DW, Schmalbrock P. Magnetic resonance imaging of motion and flow. In: Chakeres DW, Schmalbrock P. Fundamentals of magnetic resonance imaging. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1992.
14. Rutt, BK, Lee DH. The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI. JMRI 1996; 1:57-62.