Relationship between fetal monitoring and resuscitative needs: Fetal distress versus routine cesarean deliveries

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 101-104

  Posen, Robert ^a,b   Friedlich, Philippe ^a   Chan, Linda ^a   Miller, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; NEWBORN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FETAL DISTRESS; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PREGNANCY; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0034150373     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200316     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jacob J, Pfenninger J. Cesarean deliveries: when is a pediatrician necessary? Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:217-20.
2. Ng PC, Wong MY, Nelson EA. Paediatrician attendance at caesarean sections. Eur J Pediatr 1995;154:672-5.
3. Chelmow D, Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:486-91.
4. Stafford RS. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California. West J Med 1990;153:511-4.
5. Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:899-907.
6. Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus auscultation: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:149-55.
7. Samo AP Jr, Phelan JP, Ahn MO. Relationship of early intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns to subsequent patterns and fetal outcome. J Reprod Med 1990;35: 239-42.
8. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Soliani A, Romanini C. Doppler velocimetry versus nonstress test in the antepartum monitoring of low-risk pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:331-5.
9. Lidegaard O, Bottcher LM, Weber T. Description, evaluation, and clinical decision-making according to various fetal heart rate patterns. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71:48-53.
10. Baruffi G, Strobino DM, Paine LL. Investigation of institutional differences in primary cesarean birth rates. J Nurse Midwifery 1990;35:274-81.
11. Roemer VM, Heger-Romermann G. What factors modify the conditions of the newborn infant in emergency cesarean section? [in German] Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1992;196:141-51.
12. Saili A, Sama MS, Haldar D, Kumari S, Dutta AK. Delayed cesarean section: neonatal outcome. Indian Pediatr 1990;27:601-4.
13. Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:231-4.