The case for national missile defense

Orbis

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 187-196

  Payne, Keith B ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034148556     PISSN: 00304387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0030-4387(00)00020-X     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. 1 See, for example, Gen. Henry Shelton's statements in Rowan Scarborough, "Chiefs defend stand on missiles," Washington Times, Aug. 27, 1998.
2. 2 See, for example, George Lewis, Lisbeth Gronlund, and David Wright, "National Missile Defense: An Indefensible System," Foreign Policy, Winter 1999-2000, pp. 120-37.
3. 3 Jan Lodal, principal deputy under secretary of defense, with selected reporters, July 31, 1995, Washington, D.C., news conference transcript, pp. 9-10.
4. 4 Spurgeon Keeny, "Inventing and Enemy," New York Times, June 18, 1994.
5. 5 See Keith B. Payne, Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age (Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 1996).
6. 6 U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, Sept. 15, 1999, p. 8.
7. 7 Paul Nitze, for example, suggests conventional preemption of rogue nuclear capabilities upon "unambiguous indication" of their intended use. See "A Threat Mostly to Ourselves," New York Times, Oct. 28, 1999.
8. 8 See, for example, Robert Turner, The ABM Treaty and the Senate: Issues of International and Constitutional Law, report, Center for National Security Law, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Va., May 14, 1999.