Anaphora interpretations in Spanish utterances and the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 389-424

  Blackwell, Sarah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaphora; Consistency constraints; Coreference; Gricean theory; Pragmatics; Pronouns; Reflexives

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034147396     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00057-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ariel, Mira, 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30: 3-42.
2. Ariel, Mira, 1996. Referring expressions and the +/-coreference distinction. In: T. Fretheim and J.K. Gundel, eds., Reference and referent accessibility, 13-35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
3. Blackwell, Sarah E., 1998. Constraints on Spanish NP anaphora: The syntactic versus the pragmatic domain. Hispania 81 (3): 606-618.
4. Bolinger, Dwight, 1979. Pronouns in discourse. In: T. Givón, ed., Discourse and syntax (Syntax and semantics) 12: 289-310. New York: Academic Press.
5. Bosch, Peter, 1983. Agreement and anaphora: A study of the role of pronouns in syntax and discourse. London: Academic Press.
6. Brucart, José M., 1987. La elisión sintáctica en español. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
7. Chomsky, Noam, 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
8. Chomsky, Noam, 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cook, Guy, 1994. Discourse and literature: The interplay of form and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Cornish, Francis, 1986. Anaphoric relations in English and French: A discourse perspective. London: Croom Helm.
11. Givón, Talmy, ed., 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Grice, H. Paul, 1975. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, eds., Speech acts (Syntax and semantics) 3: 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
13. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski, 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274-307.
14. Haegeman, Liliane, 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Horn, Lawrence R., 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In: D. Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, 11-42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Huang, Yan, 1991. A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27: 301-335.
17. Huang, Yan, 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kempson, Ruth M., 1984. Pragmatics, anaphora, and logical form. In: D. Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, 1-10. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
19. Kempson, Ruth M., 1988. Grammar and conversational principles. In: F.J. Newmeyer, ed., Linguistics, vol. 2: The Cambridge survey, 139-163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kuno, Susumo, 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Levinson, Stephen C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Levinson, Stephen C., 1987a. Minimization and conversational inference. In: J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi, eds., The pragmatic perspective, 61-129. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23. Levinson, Stephen C., 1987b. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379-434.
24. Levinson, Stephen C., 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27: 107-161.
25. Linde, Charlotte, 1979. Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. In: T. Givón, ed., Discourse and syntax (Syntax and semantics) 12: 337-354. New York: Academic Press.
26. Luján, Marta, 1985. Binding properties of overt pronouns in null pronominal languages. Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 424-438.
27. Luján, Marta, 1986. Stress and binding of pronouns. Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 248-262
28. Lust, Barbara, ed., 1986. Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. 1: Defining the constraints. Dordrecht: Reidel.
29. Marslen-Wilson, William, Elena Levy and Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler, 1982. Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In: R.J. Jarvella and W. Klein, eds., Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics, 339-378. New York: Wiley.
30. McCray, Alexa T., 1980. The semantics of backward anaphora. In: T. Jensen, ed., Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Tenth North Eastern Linguistic Society, 329-343. Ottawa, Canada: North Eastern Linguistic Society.
31. Mittwoch, Anita, 1983. Backward anaphora and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 129-139.
32. Omaggio Hadley, Alice, 1993. Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
33. Prince, Ellen F., 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In: P. Cole, ed., Radical pragmatics, 223-255. New York: Academic Press.
34. Reinhart, Tanya, 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 59-94.
35. Reinhart, Tanya, 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
36. Reinhart, Tanya, 1986. Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. In: B. Lust, ed., Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. 1: Defining the constraints, 123-150. Dordrecht: Reidel.
37. Reuland, Eric and Jan Koster, 1991. Long distance anaphora: An overview. In: J. Koster and E. Reuland, eds., Long-distance anaphora, 1-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rigau, Gemma, 1986. Some remarks on the nature of strong pronouns in null-subject languages. In: I. Bordelois, H. Contreras and K. Zagona, eds., Generative studies in Spanish syntax, 143-163. Dordrecht: Foris.
39. Rivero, María Luisa, 1986. Binding in NPs. In: I. Bordelois, H. Contreras, and K. Zagona, eds., Generative studies in Spanish syntax, 165-181. Dordrecht: Foris.
40. Rumelhart, David, 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In: D. Bobrow and A. Collins, eds., Representation and understanding, 211-236. New York: Academic Press.
41. Schank, Roger C. and Robert Abelson, 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. arb. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 188-191.
43. Takami, Ken-ichi, 1987. Anaphora in Japanese: Some semantic and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 169-191.
44. Tannen, Deborah, 1979. What's in a frame: Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: R. Freedle, ed., New directions in discourse processing, 137-181. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Van Dijk, Teun A. and Walter Kintsch, 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
46. Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65: 695-727.