Do students' judgment models of instructor effectiveness differ by course level, course content, or individual instructor?

Journal of Accounting Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 15-34

  Bailey, Charles D ^a   Gupta, Sanjay ^b   Schrader, Richard W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034147170     PISSN: 07485751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00006-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahmavaara, Y. (1954). The mathematical theory of factorial invariance under selection. Psychometrika, 19, 27-35.
2. Andersen, K., & Miller, E. D. (1997). Gender and student evaluations of teaching. Political Science and Politics, 30, 216-219.
3. Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (1997). Behavioral Accounting Research: Foundations and Frontiers. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
4. Ashton, R. H. (1982). Human information processing in accounting. In Studies in Accounting Research, Vol. 17.. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
5. Braskamp, L. A., Brandenberg, D. C., & Ory, J. C. (1985). Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: A Practical Guide. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
6. Brightman, H. J., Bhada, Y., Elliott, M., & Vandenberg, R. (1992). An Empirical Study to Examine the Reliability and Validity of a Student Evaluation of Instructor Instrument. Working Paper, Department of Quantitative Methods, Georgia State University.
7. Briscoe, N. R., Glezen, G. W., & Letzkus, W. C. (1996). The association of accounting course content groupings and student evaluations. Accounting Educators' Journal, 8, 14-26.
8. Calderon, T., Gabbin, A., & Green, B. (1997). Framework for Encouraging Effective Teaching. Harrisonburg, VA: Center for Research in Accounting Education, James Madison University.
9. Calderon, T. G., & Green, B. P. (1997). Use of multiple information types in assessing accounting faculty teaching performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 15, 221-239.
10. Calderon, T. G., Green, B. P., & Reider, B. P. (1997). Perceptions and use of student evaluations by heads of accounting departments. Accounting Educators' Journal, 9, 1-27.
11. Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development in Higher Education, Kansas State University.
12. DeBerg, C. L., & Wilson, J. R. (1990). An empirical investigation of the potential confounding variables in student evaluation of teaching. Journal of Accounting Education, 8, 37-62.
13. Freeman, H. R. (1988). Perceptions of teacher characteristics and student judgments of teacher effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 158-160.
14. Giacomino, D. E., & Akers, M. D. (1998). An examination of the differences between personal values and value types of female and male accounting and nonaccounting majors. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), 565-584.
15. Harrison, F. L. (1977). Decision making in conditions of extreme uncertainty. Journal of Management Studies, 14, 169-178.
16. Hochberg, Y., & Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 342-344.
18. Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Koon, J., & Murray, H. G. (1995). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 61-81.
20. Levine, M. S. (1977). Canonical Analysis and Factor Comparison. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1991). The multidimensionality of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The generality of factor structures across academic discipline, instructor level, and course level. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 9-18.
22. Mulford, C. W., & Schneider, A. (1988). An empirical study of structural and controllable factors affecting faculty evaluations. Advances in Accounting, 6, 205-215.
23. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd Ed.). Irwin.
24. Neumann, L., & Neumann, Y. (1985). Determinants of students' instructional evaluation: A comparison of four levels of academic areas. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 152-158.
25. Rebele, J. E., Apostolou, B. A., Buckless, F. A., Hassell, J. M., Paquette, L. R., & Stout, D. E. (1998). Accounting education literature review (1991-1997), part II: Students, educational technology, assessment, and faculty issues. Journal of Accounting Education, 16, 179-245.
26. Sander, J. F., & Reding, K. F. (1993). An empirical investigation of entry-level accountants' cognitive abilities. Accounting Educators' Journal, 5, 42-54.
27. Shapiro, E. G. (1990). Effects of instructor and class characteristics on students' class evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 31, 135-148.
28. Wallace, J. J., & Wallace, W. A. (1998). Why the costs of student evaluations have long since exceeded their value. Issues in Accounting Education, 13, 443-447.
29. Williams, J. R., Herring III, H. C., Scheiner, J. H., & Tiller, M. G. (1988). A framework for the development of accounting education research. Accounting Education Series, Vol. 9. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
30. Wright, P., Whittington, R., & Whittenburg, G. E. (1984). Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: What the research reveals Journal of Accounting Education, 2, 5-30.
31. Yunker, P. J., & Sterner, J. (1988). A survey of faculty performance evaluation in accounting. Accounting Educators' Journal, 1, 63-74.