The effectiveness of contingency-specific and contingency-nonspecific prompts in controlling bathroom graffiti

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-92

  Mueller, Michael M ^b   Moore, James W ^b   Doggett, R Anthony ^b   Tingstrom, Daniel H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Community behavior analysis; Graffiti; Prompts; Signs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; SANITATION; WRITING;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TOILET FACILITIES; WRITING;

EID: 0034145272     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-89     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Austin, J., Hatfield, D. B., Grindle, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effects of specific informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 247-253.
2. Cope, J. C., & Allred, L. J. (1991). Community intervention to deter illegal parking in spaces reserved for the physically disabled. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 687-693.
3. Watson, T. S. (1996). A prompt plus delayed contingency procedure for reducing bathroom graffiti. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 121-124.