Enhanced oil recovery what we have learned

Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 7-11

  Farouq Ali, S M ^a  

^a Petroleum Engineering and Research Laboratories Canada Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034143572     PISSN: 00219487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. BLACKWELL, R.J., An Overview of In Situ Methods for Determining Remaining Oil Saturation; SPE 13702, 1985 Middle East Oil Technology Conference, pp. 1-15, March 11 - 14, 1985
2. DYER, S.B., Performance of the Immiscible Carbon Dioxide WAG Process at Low Pressure; M.Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta, 1989.
3. FAROUQ ALI, S.M. and THOMAS, S., The Promise and Problems of Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods; Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, pp. 57-63, September 1996.
4. BATYCKY, J.P., An Assessment of In Situ Oil Sands Recovery Processes; Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, pp. 15-19, October 1997.
5. CRAIG, F.F. Jr. and PARRISH, D.R., A Multipilot Evaluation of the COFCAW Process; Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 659-666, June 1974.
6. MORIT1S, G., New Technology, Improved Economics Boost EOR Hopes; Oil & Gas Journal, pp. 49-77, April 20,1998.
7. POETTMANN, F.H., In Situ Combustion: A Current Appraisal; World Oil, April - May, 1963.
8. TABER, J.J. and SERIGHT, R.S., Horizontal Injection and Production Wells for EOR or Waterflooding; SPE 23952, Proceedings 1992 SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, pp. 11-22, March 18-20, 1992Ä