Eliminating bias in randomized cluster trials with correlated binomial outcomes

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 119-123

  Reed, James F ^a  

^a LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary data; Clustered samples; Correlation; Intracluster

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CORRELATION METHODS; ESTIMATION; FORTRAN (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE);

BINARY DATA; CLUSTERED SAMPLES;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RATS; SELECTION BIAS; SMOKING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0034142508     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2607(99)00033-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Liang K.Y., McCullagh P. Case studies in binary dispersion. Biometrics. 49:1993;623-630.
2. Donner A, Donald A. The statistical analysis of repeated binary measurements. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41:1988;899-906.
3. Rao J.N.K., Scott A.J. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics. 48:1992;577-585.
4. Rosner B., Milton R.C. Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data. Biometrics. 44:1988;505-512.
5. Mosteller F., Youtz C. Tables of the Freeman-Tukey transformations for the binomial and Poisson distributions. Biometrika. 48:1961;433-440.
6. Collins T.F.X., Mclaughlin J. Teratology studies on food colourings. Part I. Embroytoxicity of Amaranth (FD & Red No.2) in rats. Fd Cosmet. Toxicol. 10:1972;619-624.
7. Biddle F.G. Teratogenesis of acetazolamide in the CBA/J and SWV strains of mice. Teratology. 11:1975;37-46.
8. Chrisman C.L. Aneuploidy in mouse embroyos induced by diethylstilbestrol diphosphate. Teratology. 9:1974;229-232.
9. Epstein S.S., Steinberg K., Mackintosh D., Shafner H., Bishop Y. Mutagenic and antifertility effects of TEPA and METEPA in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 17:1970;23-40.
10. Epstein S.S., Arnold E., Andrea J., bass W., Bishop Y. Detection of chemical mutagens by the dominant lethal assay in the mouse. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 23:1972;288-325.
11. Wei C.S. Selection of the valid number of sampling units and a consideration of their combination in toxicological studies involving reproduction, teratogenesis or carcinogenesis. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 8:1970;177-182.
12. Lee E.W. Two sample comparison for large groups of correlated binary responses. Statist. Med. 15:1996;1187-1197.
13. Kleinman J.C. Proportions with extraneous variance: Single and independent samples. JASA. 68:1973;46-54.
14. Heeren T., D'Agostino R. Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal data. Statist. Med. 6:1987;79-90.
15. Williams D.A. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics. 31:1975;949-952.
16. Crowder M.J. Beta-binomial ANOVA for proportions. Appl. Statist. 27:1978;34-37.
17. Haseman J.K., Kupper L.L. Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics. 35:1979;281-293.