Intelligent interface technology: from theory to reality?

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 323-336

  McTear, M F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMMERCIAL DEPLOYABILITY; INTELLIGENT INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; USER MODELLING;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 0034140839     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00002-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gibbs W.W. Taking computers to task. Scientific American. 277:(1):1997;64-71.
2. Krause J., Mittermaier E., Hirschmann A. The intelligent help system COMFOHELP: towards a solution of the practicality problem for user modelling and adaptive systems. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction. 3:1993;249-282.
3. MSOffice, http://www.microsoft.com/office/office97/documents/intelsns/o97iswp.doc, 1996.
4. Benyon D.R., Murray D.M. Applying user modelling to human-computer interaction design. Artificial Intelligence Review. 7:1993;199-225.
5. D.R. Benyon, P.R. Innocent, D.M. Murray, System adaptivity and the modelling of stereotypes, in: B. Shackel, H.-J. Bullinger (Eds.), Proc. INTERACT '87, Second IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1987.
6. A. Jameson, C. Paris, C. Tasso (Eds.), User Modelling: Proceeding of the Sixth International Conference, UM97, Springer, Wien, New York, 1997.
7. L. Strachan, J. Anderson, M. Sneesby, M. Evans, Pragmatic user modelling in a commercial software system, in: A. Jameson, C. Paris, C. Tasso (Eds.), User Modelling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97. Springer, Wien New York, 1997, pp. 189-200.
8. UMUAINEU, http://umuaineu.informatik.uni-essen.de, 1997.
9. Allen J.F. Recognising intentions from natural language utterances. Brady M., Berwick B., Computational Models of Discourse. 1983;107-166 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Carberry S. Modelling the user's plans and goals. Computational Linguistics. 14:(3):1988;23-37.
11. Wilensky R., Chin D.N., Luria M., Martin J., Mayfield J., Wu D. The Berkeley UNIX consultant project. Computational Linguistics. 14:(4):1988;35-84.
12. H.A. Kautz, A Formal Theory of Plan Recognition, PhD thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., 1987.
13. Goodman B.A., Litman D.J. On the interaction between plan recognition and intelligent interfaces. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction. 2:1992;83-115.
14. E. Horwitz, Agents with beliefs: reflections on bayesian methods for user modelling, in: Invited talk, Sixth International Conference on User Modelling, Chia Laguna, Sardinia, 2-5 June 1997.
15. Stork D.G., HAL's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Wyard P.J., Simons A.D., Appelby S., Kaneen E., Williams S.H., Preston K.R. Spoken language systems-beyond prompt and response. BT Technology Journal. 14:(1):1996;187-205.
17. Uszkoreit H., Zaenen A. Grammar formalisms. Cole R.A., Mariani J., Uszkoreit H., Zaenen A., Zue V., Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology. 1997;100-102 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Moore R. Integration of speech with natural language understanding. Roe D.B., Wilpon J.G., Voice Communication between Humans and Machines. 1994;National Academy Press, Washington, DC. pp. 254-271.
19. Price P. Spoken language understanding. Cole R.A., Mariani J., Uszkoreit H., Zaenen A., Zue V., Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology. 1997;42-49 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Marcus M. New trends in natural language processing: statistical natural language processing. Roe D.B., Wilpon J.G., Voice Communication between Humans and Machines. 1994;Washington, DC, National Academy Press. pp. 482-504.
21. Abney S. Part-of-speech tagging and partial parsing. Young S., Bloothooft G., Corpus-based Methods in Language and Speech Processing. 1997;118-136 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
22. R.J. Perdue, J.B. Scherer, The way we were: speech technology, platforms and applications in the `old' AT&T, IVTTA: 1996 IEEE Third Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 1996, pp. 7-11.
23. A.L. Gorin, B.A. Parker, R.M. Sachs, J.G. Wilpon, How may I help you? IVTTA: 1996 IEEE Third Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 1996, pp. 57-60.
24. Aust H., Oerder M., Seide F., Steinbiss V. The Philips automatic train timetable information system. Speech Communication. 17:1995;249-262.
25. Ball G., Ling D., Kurlander D., Miller J., Pugh D., Skelly T., Stankosky A., Thiel D., Van Dantzich M. Lifelike computer characters: the persona project at microsoft research. Bradshaw J.M., Software Agents. 1996;191-222 AAAI/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Hirschman L. The roles of language processing in a spoken language interface. Roe D.B., Wilpon J.G., Voice Communication between Humans and Machines. 1994;Washington, DC, National Academy Press. pp. 217-237.
27. K. Höök, (this issue), Steps to take before IUI becomes real, in: D. Benyon (Ed.), The reality of intelligent interface technology, Special issue of Interacting with Computers.