Reply to Carron and Brawley

Small Group Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 107-118

  Carless, Sally A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034133651     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640003100106     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bernthal, P. R., & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18, 66-87.
2. Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Mangement, 17, 345-381.
3. Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
4. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 275-294.
5. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1993). The influence of the group and its cohesiveness on perceptions of group goal-related variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 245-260.
6. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71-88.
8. Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89-106.
9. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
10. Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (1999, April). A multi-dimensional approach to the group cohesion and group performance relationship. Poster session presented at the annual Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychologists, Atlanta, Georgia.
11. Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
12. Cota, A., Longman, R., Evans, C., Dion, K., & Kilik, L. (1995). Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 308-316.
13. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulleting, 52, 281-302.
14. Dion, K. L., & Evans, C. R. (1992). On cohesiveness: Reply to Keyton and other critics of the construct. Small Group Research, 23, 242-250.
15. Dyce, J. A., & Cornell, J. (1996). Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 263-264.
16. Evans, N. J., & Jarvis, P. A. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and reevaluation. Small Group Research, 11, 359-370.
17. Gal, R. (1986). Unit morale: From a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration - An Israeli example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 369-391.
18. Gerbing, D., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modelling, 3, 62-72.
19. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121-173.
20. Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Fundamental considerations about work groups. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of workgroup psychology (pp. 3-21). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
21. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
22. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). New York: Prentice Hall.
23. Harris, M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1990). Confirmatory modelling in organizational behavior: Human resource management issues and applications. Journal of Management, 16, 337-360.
24. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988.
25. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: John Wiley.
26. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. In W. Stoebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 85-111). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27. Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323-341.
28. Hoyle, R. H., & Crawford, A. M. (1994). Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies. Small Group Research, 25, 464-485.
29. Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1993). Team research in the 1990s. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 245-270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
31. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
32. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variables models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
34. McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1996). Temporal issues in work groups. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of workgroup psychology (pp. 25-52). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education and MacMillan.
36. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relations between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
37. Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622-648.
38. Piper, W. E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardson, A. M., & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93-108.
39. Podsakoff, P., & Dalton, D. (1987). Research methodology in organizational studies. Journal of Management, 13, 419-441.
40. Prapavessis, H., & Carron, A. V. (1997). Cohesion and work output. Small Group Research, 28, 294-301.
41. Schriesheim, C., Powers, K., Scandura, T., Gardiner, C., & Lankau, M. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19, 385-417.
42. Schutz, R. W., Eom, H. J., Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1994). Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 226-236.
43. Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummins (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 3-44). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44. Shaw, M. E. (1974). An overview of small group behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
45. Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Stevens, J. J. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Iowa tests of basic skills. Structural Equation Modelling, 2, 214-231.
47. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
48. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
49. Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Promoting team effectiveness. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of workgroup psychology (pp. 503-529). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
50. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-121). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
52. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
53. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ontario: Sports Dynamics.
54. Widmeyer, W. N., & Williams, J. M. (1991). Predicting cohesion in a coaching sport. Small Group Research, 22, 548-570.
55. Zaccaro, S. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387-399.
56. Zaccaro, S., & Lowe, C. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
57. Zaccaro, S. J., & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, 837-851.