Psychology without p values: Data analysis at the turn of the 19th century

American Psychologist

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 260-263

  Smith, Laurence D ^a   Best, Lisa A ^b   Cylke, Virginia A ^b   Stubbs, D Alan ^b  

^a 301 Little Hall ^*  (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HISTORY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLISHING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034132358     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.260     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Best, L. A., Bastiani, A. M., Smith, L. D., Johnston, J. M., Stubbs, D. A., & Frey, R. B. (1999, August). Data presentation in hard and soft psychology: Graphs and tables. Poster session presented at the 107th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
2. Borell, M. (1993). Training the senses, training the mind. In W. F. Bynum & R. Porter (Eds.). Medicine and the five senses (pp. 244-261). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Fisher, R. S. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
4. Funkhouser, H. G. (1937). Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data. Osiris, 3, 269-404.
5. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Hall, G. S. (1879. October 9). The graphic method. The Nation, 29, 238-239.
7. Hall, G. S. (1899). Editorial. Pedagogical Seminary, 6, 265-266.
8. Kinnaman, A. J. (1901). A comparison of judgments for weights lifted with the hand and foot. American Journal of Psychology, 12, 240-263.
9. Lenoir, T. (Ed.). (1998). Inscribing science: Scientific texts and the materiality of communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Loftus, G. R. (1993). A picture is worth a thousand p values: On the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 250-256.
11. Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. McGhee, Z. (1900). A study in the play life of some South Carolina children. Pedagogical Seminary, 7, 459-477.
13. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
14. Partridge, G. E. (1900). Experiments upon the control of the reflex wink. American Journal of Psychology, 11, 244-250.
15. Pearson, E. S. (1938). Karl Pearson: An appreciation of some aspects of his life and work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Rucci, A. J., & Tweney, R. D. (1980). Analysis of variance and the "second discipline" of scientific psychology: A historical account. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 166-184.
17. Stewart, C. C. (1900). Zöllner's anorthoscopic illusion. American Journal of Psychology, 11, 240-243.
18. Stigler, S. M. (1986). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplements, 2, 1-109.
20. Tukey, J. W. (1969). Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work? American Psychologist, 24, 83-91.
21. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Vostrovsky, C. (1899). A study of children's reading tastes. Pedagogical Seminary, 6, 523-535.