What kind of dialogue should paradigm-dialogues be?

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-63

  Smaling, Adri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUMANISTIC STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Authenticity; Communicative quality; Dialogical relationship; Irony; Mutual respect; Openness; Paradigm dialogue; Persuasiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034131574     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004747524463     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Blaikie, N. W. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality & Quantity, 25: 115-136.
2. Boer, Th. De (1978). Hermeneutiek en ideologiekritiek. In: H. Kunneman (ed.), Wetenschappen ideologiekritiek. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom, pp. 96-134.
3. Boog, B., H. Coenen, L. Keune & R. Lammerts (eds) (1996). Theory and Practice of Action Research. With special reference to The Netherlands, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
4. Cockcroft, R. & S. M. Cockcroft (1992). Persuading People. An Introduction to Rhetoric. London: Macmillan.
5. Coenen, H. (1987). Handelingsonderzoek als exemplarisch leren. Groningen: Konstapel.
6. Elders, F. (1996). Dialogue and meaning. In: Dialogue and Universalism, Vol. 6, Nos. 5-6, pp. 27-40.
7. Flood, R. L. & N. R. A. Romm (1996). Diversity Management. Triple Loop Learning. Chichester: Wiley.
8. Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr.
9. Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
10. Guba, E. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In: E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigmdialog. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 17-30.
11. Habermas, J. (1971). Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz. In: J. Habermas & N. Luhmann (eds), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie - Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, pp. 101-141.
12. Habermas, J. (1973). Wahrheitstheorien. In: H. Fahrenbach (Hrsg.), Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Pfüllingen: Neske, 211 vv.
13. Halfpenny, P. (1997). The relation between quantitative and qualitative social research. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologigue 57: 49-64.
14. Hermans, H. J. M. & H. J. G. Kempen (1993). The Dialogical Self. Meaning as Movement. San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Heron, J. (1996). Co-Operative Inquiry. Research into the Human Condition. London: Sage.
16. Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism. Bakhtin and his World. London: Routledge.
17. Kellendonk, F. (1986). Idolen. From: Oprecht veinzen. In: F. Kellendonk (1992), Het complete werk. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff, pp. 847-860.
18. Kuhn, Th. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2nd edn).
19. Kuhn, Th. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kunneman, H. (1986). De waarheidstrechter. Een communicatietheoretisch perspectief opwetenschap en samenleving. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom
21. Lincoln, Y. S. & E. G. Guba (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.
22. Linell, P. (1990). The power of dialogue dynamics. In: I. Markovà & K. Foppa (eds), The Dynamics of Dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 147-177.
23. Marsh, D. (1980). The Quattrocento Dialogue. Classical Tradition and Humanist Innovation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. Reason, P. (ed.) (1994). Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage.
25. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency. Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Smaling, A. (1994). Paradigmatic and pragmatic aspects of choosing a qualitative or quantitative method. Quality & Quantity 28: 233-249.
27. Smaling, A. (1995). Open-mindedness, open-heartedness and dialogical openness: the dialectics of openings and closures. In: I. Maso, P. Atkinson, S. Delamont & J. Verhoeven (eds), Openness in Research. Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 21-32.
28. Smaling, A. (1996a). Qualitative interviewing: contextualization and empowerment. In: I. Maso & F. Wester (eds), The Deliberate Dialogue. Brussel: VUBpress, pp. 15-28.
29. Smaling, A. (1996b). Argumentation, cooperation and charity in qualitative inquiry. In: Dialogue and Universalism, Nos. 5-6, pp. 163-172.
30. Smaling, A. (1998). Dialogical partnership - The relationship between the researcher and the researched in action research. In: B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune & R. Lammerts (eds), The Complexity of Relationships in Action Research. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, pp. 1-16.
31. Smith, J. K. & L. Heshusius (1986). Closing down the conversation: the end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher 15: 4-12.
32. Snyder, J. R. (1989). Writing the Scene of Speaking. Theories of Dialogue in the Late Italian Renaissance. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.