Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: A preference study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-51

  Sivaramakrishna, Radhika ^a   Obuchowski, Nancy A ^a   Chilcote, William A ^a   Cardenosa, Gilda ^a   Powell, Kimerly A ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034131449     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750045     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Giovino GA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1996, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:675-690
2. Sivaramakrishna R, Gordon R. Detection of breast cancer at a smaller size can reduce the likelihood of metastatic spread: a quantitative analysis. Acad Radiol 1997;4:8-12
3. Moskowitz M. Breast imaging. In: Donegan WL, Spratt JS, eds. Cancer of the breast. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1995:206-239
4. Sabel M, Aichinger H. Recent developments in breast imaging. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:315-368
5. Kim JK, Park JM, Song KS, Park HW. Adaptive mammographic image enhancement using first derivative and local statistics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:495-502
6. Lure FYM, Jones PW, Garborski RS. Multi-resolution unsharp masking technique for mammogram image enhancement. Proc SPIE (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers) 1996;2710:830-839
7. Pizer SM, Ambum EOP, Austin JD, et al. Adaptive histogram equalisation and its variations. CVGIP (Computer Vision Graphics & Image Processing) 1987;39:355-368
8. Paranjape RB, Morrow WM, Rangayyan RM. Adaptive-neighborhood histogram equalization for image enhancement. CVCIP (Computer Vision Graphics & Image Processing) 1992;54:254-267
9. Gordon R, Rangayyan RM. Feature enhancement of film nummograms using fixed and adaptive neighborhoods. Appl Opl 1984;23:560-564
10. Dhawan AP, Buelloni G, Gordon R. Enhancement of mammographic features by optimal adaptive neighborhood image processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986;MI-5:8-15
11. Morrow WM, Paranjape RB, Rangayyan RM. Region-based contrast enhancement ol mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992;11:342-406
12. Rangayyan RM, Shen L, Shen Y, et al. Improvement of sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis with adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of mammograms. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 1997;1:161-170
13. Laine AF, Schuler S, Fan J, Huda W. Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:725-774
14. Laine AF, Fan J, Yang W. Wavelets for contrast enhancement of digital mammography. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1995;14:536-550
15. Kallergi M, Clarke LP, Qian W, et a. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized and wavelet-enhaneed monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study. Acad Radiol 1996;3:285-293
16. Sutton MA, Bezdek J. Enhancement and analysis of digital mammograms using fuzzy models. Proc SPIE 1997;3240:179-190
17. Ji TL, Sundareshan MK, Roehrig H. Adaptive image contrast enhancement based on human visual properties. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:573-586
18. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Digital image'processing. 1st ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992
19. Mallat S, Zhong S. Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Trims PAMI (Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence) 1992;14:710-732
20. Good WF, Sumkin JH, Dash N, et al. Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment. AJR 1999;173:275-278
21. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stut 1979;6:65-70
22. Noether GE. Sample size determination for some common nonparametric tests. J Am Stat Assn 1987;82:645-647
23. Puff DT, Pisano ED, Muller KE, et al. A method for determination of optimal image enhancement tor the detection of mammographic abnormalities. J Digital Imaging 1994;7:161-171