Computer-aided diagnosis for surgical office-based breast ultrasound

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 696-699

  Chang, Ruey Feng ^a   Kuo, Wen Jia ^a   Chen, Dar Ren ^b   Huang, Yu Len ^a   Lee, Jau Hong ^b   Chou, Yi Hong ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 0034129250     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.6.696     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hieken TJ, Velasco JM. A prospective analysis of office-based breast ultrasound. Arch Surg. 1998;133:504-508.
2. Gurney JW, Neural networks at the crossroads: caution ahead. Radiology. 1994; 193:27-28.
3. Boone JM. Neural networks at the crossroads. Radiology. 1993;189:357-359.
4. Astion ML, Wilding P. The application of backpropagation neural networks to problems in pathology and laboratory medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992; 116:995-1001.
5. Piraino DW, Amartur SC, Richmond BJ, et al. Application of an artificial neural network in radiographic diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1991;4:226-232.
6. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Williford ME, Floyd CE. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology. 1995;196:817-822.
7. Biagiotti R, Oesii C, Vanzi E, GacciG. Predicting ovarian malignancy: application of artificial neural networks to transvaginal and color Ooppler flow. Radiology, 1999;210:399-403.
8. Asada N, Doi K, Mahon HM, et al. Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: pilot study. Radiology. 1990;177:857-860.
9. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15:598-610.
10. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, Ascher S. Muk SK, Zeman RK. Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;13:267-285.
11. Kohonen T. Improved versions of learning vector quantization. Proc Int Jt Conference on Neural Networks. 1990;1:545-550.
12. Kohonen T, Oja E, Simula O, Visa A., Kangas, J. Engineering applications of the self-organizing map. Proc IEEE. 1996;84:1358-1384.
13. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Image compression. In: Digital Image Processing. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman Inc; 1992:312-315.
14. Kohonen T. The self-organizing map. Proc IEEE. 1990;78:1464-1480.
15. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123-134.
16. Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibro-adenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:109-114.