Arizona porphyry copper/hydrothermal deposits I. The structure of chenevixite and luetheite

Mineralogical Magazine

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-30

  Burns, P C ^a   Smith, J V ^b   Steele, I M ^b  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

CCD detector; Chenevixite; Cu oxysalt; Luetheite; Structure determination

Indexed keywords

COPPER; CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROTHERMAL DEPOSIT; PORPHYRY;

ARIZONA; HUMBOLDT MINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034127030     PISSN: 0026461X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1180/002646100549102     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brese, N.E. and O'Keeffe, M. (1991) Bond-valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallogr., B47, 192-7.
2. Burns, P.C. (1998) CCD area detectors of X-rays applied to the analysis of mineral structures. Canad. Mineral., 36, 847-853.
3. 2+ oxysalts. Canad. Mineral., 34, 1089-105.
4. Eby, R.K. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993) Structural relations in copper oxysalt minerals. I. Structural hierarchy. Acta Crystallogr., B49, 28-56.
5. Herbst-Irmer, R. and Sheldrick, G.M. (1998) Refinement of twinned structures with SHELXL97. Acta Crystallogr., B54, 443-9.
6. Ibers, .I.A. and Hamilton, W.C., eds. (1974): International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, IV. The Kynoch Press, Birmingham, U.K.
7. Jameson, G.B. (1982) On structure refinement using data from a twinned crystal. Acta Crystallogr., A38, 817-20.
8. 2O, a new mineral from Arizona, compared with chenevixite. Mineral. Mag., 41, 27-32.