The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches

Weed Science

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 385-392

  Teasdale, John R ^a   Mohler, Charles L ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

ABUTH; AMARE; CHEAL; Cover crop; Light extinction; Litter; Residue; Seedling; SEFTA

Indexed keywords

EMERGENCE; MULCH; WEED; WEED CONTROL;

ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI; AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; QUERCUS; SECALE CEREALE; SETARIA FABERI; TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM; VICIA VILLOSA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0034126742     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0385:TQRBWE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alm, D. M., E. W. Stoller, and L. M. Wax. 1993. An index model for predicting seed germination and emergence rates. Weed Technol. 7: 560-569.
2. Blum, U., L. D. King, T. M. Gerig, M. E. Lehman, and A. D. Worsham. 1997. Effects of clover and small gram cover crops and tillage techniques on seedling emergence of some dicotyledonous weed species. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12:146-161.
3. Bosy, J. L. and R. J. Reader. 1995. Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass litter. Functional Ecol. 9:635-639.
4. Buhler, D. D., T. C. Mester, and K. A. Kohler. 1996. The effect of maize residues and tillage on emergence of Setaria faberi, Abutilon theophrasti, Amarathus retroflexus and Chenopodium album. Weed Res. 36:153-165.
5. Facelli, J. M. and S.T.A. Pickett. 1991a. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev. 57:1-32.
6. Facelli, J. M. and S.T.A. Pickett. 1991b. Plant litter: Light interception and effects on an old-field plant community. Ecol. 72:1024-1031.
7. Forcella, F. 1998. Real-time assessment of seed dormancy and seedling growth for weed management. Seed Sci. Res. 8:201-209.
8. Gallagher, R. S. and J. Cardina. 1998. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination II: development of very low fluence sensitivity. Weed Sci. 46:53-58.
9. Gregory, J. M. 1982. Soil cover prediction with various amounts and types of crop residue. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1333-1337.
10. Hatfield, J. L. 1998. Application of micrometeorology to weed biology and modeling. Pages 271-292 in J. L. Hatfield, D. D. Buhler, and B. A. Stewart, eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.
11. Lybecker, D. W., E. E. Schweizer, and R. P. King. 1991. Weed management decisions in corn based on bioeconomic modeling. Weed Sci. 39:124-129.
12. Mohler, C. E. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol. Applic. 3:53-73.
13. Mohler, C. E. and J. R. Teasdale. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33: 487-499.
14. Swinton, S. M. and R. P. King. 1994. A bioeconomic model for weed management in corn and soybean. Agric. Syst. 44:313-335.
15. Teasdale, J. R. 1998. Cover crops, smother plants, and weed management. Pages 247-270 in J. L. Hatfield, D. D. Buhler, and B. A. Stewart, eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.
16. Teasdale, J. R. and C. L. Mohler. 1993. Eight transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85:673-680.
17. Vidal, R. A. and T. T. Bauman. 1996. Surface wheat residues, giant foxtail and soybean yield. Weed Sci. 44:939-943.
18. Wagner-Riddle, C., T. J. Gillespie, and C. J. Swanton. 1996. Rye mulch characterization for the purpose of microclimate modelling. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 78:67-81.
19. White, R. H., A. D. Worsham, and U. Blum. 1989. Allelopathic potential of legume debris and aqueous extracts. Weed Sci. 37:674-679.
20. Williams II, M. M., D. A. Mortensen, and J. W. Doran. 1998. Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 46:595-603.