Pupillomotor campimetry in normals

Neuro-Ophthalmology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-13

  Schmid, Rüdiger ^a   Wilhelm, Barbara ^a   Wilhelm, Helmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Campimetry; Normal; Perimetry; Pupil; Retinal asymmetry; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PUPILLOMETRY; RETINA; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0034126583     PISSN: 01658107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/0165-8107(200002)23:1;1-d;ft007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 1 Alexandridis E, Krastel H. Pupillographische Perimetrie mit dem 'Octopus'. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1989; 86:692-694.
2. 2 Moore PA, Kardon RH. Functional visual field loss: comparison of visual and pupil perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(Suppl): S455.
3. 3 Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Mukuno K, Ishikawa S. Objective visual field measurement using pupil perimetry -clinical applications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37(Suppl): S160
4. 4 Alexandridis E, Krastel H, Reuther R. Pupillenreflexstrungen bei Lesionen der oberen Sehbahn. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1979;209:199-208.
5. 5 Bresky RH, Charles S. Pupil motor perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68:108-112.
6. 6 Cibis GW, Campos EC, Aulhorn E. Pupillary hemiakinesia in suprageniculate lesions. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:1322-1327.
7. 7 Hamann KU, Hellner KA, Muller JA, Zschocke S. Videopupillographic and VER investigations in patients with congenital and acquired lesions of the optic radiation. Ophthalmologica 1979;178:348-356.
8. 8 Harms H, Aulhorn E, Ksinsik R. Die Ergebnisse pupillomotorischer Perimetrie bei Sehhirnverletzten und die Vorstellungen über den Verlauf der Lichtreflexbahn. In: Dodt E, Schrader KE, eds. Die Normale und die Gestörte Pupillenbewegung. München: J.F. Bergmann, 1973; 72-82.
9. 9 Hellner KA, Jensen W, Müller-Jensen A. Fernsehbildanalytische pupillographische Perimetrie bei Hemianopsie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1978;172:731-735.
10. 10 Kardon RH. Pupil perimetry. Editorial review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1992; 3:565-570.
11. 11 Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmology 1991;98: 485-495.
12. 12 Narasaki S, Kawai K, Kubota S, Noguchi J. Videopupillographic perimetry and its clinical application. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1974;18:253-274.
13. 13 Horton JC, Hoyt WF. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:816-824.
14. 14 Newsome DA, Loewenfeld IE. Iris mechanics. II. Influence of pupil size on details of iris structure. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;71:553-573.
15. 15 Loewenfeld IE. The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications, Vol. 1, Ch. 3. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1993.
16. 16 Schmid R. Naso-temporale Asymmetrie des Pupillensystems: Konsequenzen für den Verlauf der Pupillen-Lichtreflexbahn. Aachen, Maastricht: Shaker, 1998.
17. 17 Wannek U. Modellentwicklung eines Regelkreises der Pupillomotorik. Phys. Dissertation, University of Tübingen, 1994.
18. 18 Fankhauser F II, Flammer J. Puptrak 1.0 - a new semiautomated system for pupillometry with the Octopus perimeter: a preliminary report. Doc Ophthalmol 1990;73:235-248.
19. 19 Turtschi S, Bergamin O, Dubler B, Schtzau A, Zulauf M. Pupillenperimetrie mit dem OCTOPUS 1-2-3. Erste Erfahrungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1994;204:398-399.
20. 20 Wilhelm B, Wilhelm H, Luedtke H, Streicher P, Adler M. Pupillographic assessment of sleepiness in sleep-deprived healthy subjects. Sleep 1998; 21(3):258-265.
21. 21 Cox TA, Drewes CP. Contraction anisocoria resulting from half-field illumination. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97:577-582.
22. 22 Schmid R, Wilhelm B, Wilhelm H. Naso-temporal asymmetry and contraction anisocoria in the pupillomotor system. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (in press).
23. 23 Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5-25.
24. 24 Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 1990;292:497-523.
25. 25 Jonas JB, Schneider U, Naumann GO. Count and density of human retinal photoreceptors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992;230:505-510.
26. 26 Østerberg G. Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmol 1935;6(Suppl):8.
27. 27 Van Buren JM. The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1963; 62,130.
28. 28 Dietrich TJ, Ata N, Saenger A, Selig B, Schiefer U, Benda N. Age influences asymmetry in differential luminance sensitivity. In: Wall M, Wild JM, editors. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. Kugler, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1999; in press.
29. 29 Katz J, Sommer A. Asymmetry and variation in the normal hill of vision. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:65-68.
30. 30 Li Y, Wu Z, Jiang Y. Quantitative analysis of light sensitivities in central 30-degree visual field of normal Chinese and glaucoma patients. Chin Med J Engl 1997;110:129-133.
31. 31 Mills RP. Discussion of: Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS. Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmology 1991;98:495-496.
32. 32 Weber J, Papoulis C, Schmitz A. Neue diagnostische Hilfen in der automatischen Perimetrie. Ophthalmologe 1993;90:120-127.