Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block: Experience with 400 cases

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 809-812

  Gabrielli, Francesco ^a,b   Cioffi, Ugo ^a   Chiarelli, Marco ^a   Guttadauro, Angelo ^a   De Simone, Matilde ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hemorrhoidectomy; Posterior perineal block

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINE RETENTION;

EID: 0034125945     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02238019     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Detmer DE, Gerlijns AC. Ambulatory surgery. A more cost-effective treatment strategy? Arch Surg 1994;129: 123-7.
2. Marti MC, Laverriere C. Proctological outpatient surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:223-6.
3. Marti MC. L'anesthésie locale en proctologie. Nouv Presse Méd 1976;5:2075-7.
4. Petros JG, Bradley TM. Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for benign anorectal disease. Am J Surg 1990;159:374-6.
5. Hoff SD, Bailey HR, Butts DR, et al. Ambulatory surgical hemorrhoidectomy - a solution to postoperative urinary retention? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1242-4.