Dioecy in south American Deprea (Solanaceae)

Biotropica

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 291-298

  Sawyer, Neil W ^a   Anderson, Gregory J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Crossing studies; Deprea; Functional or cryptic dioecy; Protogyny; Solanaceae

Indexed keywords

DIOECY; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLOGY; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

SOUTH AMERICA;

DEPREA; DEPREA PANEROI;

EID: 0034125166     PISSN: 00063606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00472.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDERSON, G. J. 1979. Dioecious Solanum of hermaphroditic origin is an example of a broad convergence. Nature 282: 836-838.
2. _, AND D. A. LEVINE. 1982. Three taxa constitute the sexes of a single dioecious species of Solanum. Taxon 31: 667-672.
3. _, AND G. L. STEBBINS. 1984. Dioecy versus gametophytic self-incompatibility: a test. Am. Nat. 124: 423-428.
4. _, AND _. 1994. Nothing transferred, nothing gained: dioecy and gametophytic self-incompatibility continued. Am. Nat. 144: 688-691.
5. _, AND D. E. SYMON. 1988. Insect foragers on Solanum flowers in Australia. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 842-852.
6. _, AND _. 1989. Functional dioecy and andromonoecy in Solanum. Evolution 43: 204-219.
7. BARBOZA, G. E., AND A. T. HUNZIKER. 1991. Estudios sobre Solanaceae XXXI. Peculiaridades del androceo de inters taxonómico en Solanum. Kurtziana 21: 185-194.
8. BAWA, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-39.
9. _, AND J. H. BEACH. 1981. Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 68: 224-274.
10. BENÍTEZ DE ROJAS, C. E., AND M. MARTÍNEZ. 1992. A new species of Deprea (Solanaceae) from Venezuela. Phytologia 73: 270-273.
11. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female function in hermaphrodites. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15: 57-74.
12. D'ARCY, W. G. 1979. The classification of the Solanaceae. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding (Eds.). The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 3-48. Academic Press, London, England.
13. _. 1991. The Solanaceae since 1976, with a review of its biogeography. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and N. Estrada (Eds.). Solanaceae III: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution, pp. 75-137. Royal Botanic Garden Kew and Linnaen Society of London, London, England.
14. GENTRY, A. H. 1974. Flowering phenology and diversity in tropical Bignoniaceae. Biotropica 6: 64-68.
15. GIVNISH, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in the gymnosperms. Evolution 34: 959-972.
16. HAEGI, L. 1981. A conspectus of Solanaceae tribe Anthocercideae. Telopea 2: 173-180.
17. HAUSER, E. J. P., AND J. P. MORRISON. 1964. The cytochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium as an index of pollen viability. Am. J. Bot. 51: 748-752.
18. HEPPER, F. N. 1991. Old World Withania (Solanaceae): a taxonomic review and key to the species. In loc. cit., pp. 211-227.
19. HUNZIKER, A. T. 1979. South American Solanaceae: a synoptic survey. In loc. cit., pp. 49-85. Academic Press, London, England.
20. KNAPP, S. 1991. A revision of the Solanum sessile species group (section Geminata pro parte: Solanaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 179-210.
21. LANDE, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Anderson (Eds.). Sexual selection: testing the alternatives, pp. 85-94. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
22. _, AND S. J. ARNOLD. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
23. LEVINE, D. A., AND G. J. ANDERSON. 1986. Evolution of dioecy in an American Solanum. In W. G. D'Arcy (Ed.). Solanaceae: biology and systematics, pp. 264-273. Columbia University Press, New York, New York.
24. LEWIS, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40: 56-63.
25. LLOYD, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-incompatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 195: 3-133.
26. _. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Am. Nat. 120: 571-585.
27. MARTIN, F. W. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34: 125-138.
28. MAYER, S. S., AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1991. Cryptic dioecy in flowering plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 320-325.
29. MINNE, L., J. J. SPIES, H. J. T. VENTER, AND A. M. VENTER. 1994. Breeding systems in some representatives of the genus Lycium (Solanaceae) Bothalia 24:107-110.
30. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Solanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79: 346-360.
31. RENNER, S. S., AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82: 596-606.
32. RICHARDS, A. J. 1997. Plant breeding systems, pp. 161-163. Chapman and Hall, London, England.
33. ROSS, M. D. 1970. Evolution of dioecy from gynodioecy. Evolution 24: 827-828.
34. SAWYER, N. W. 1999. The systematics of Deprea Raf. and Larnax (Miers) Hunz. (Solanaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
35. SEAVEY, S. R., AND K. S. BAWA. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in the angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 52: 195-219.
36. SPIES, J. J., L. MINNE, H. J. T. VENTER, AND A. M. VENTER. 1993. A cytogenetic study of the functionally dioecious species in the genus Lycium (Solanaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 59: 535-540.
37. SYMON, D. E. 1970. Dioecious Solanums. Taxon. 19: 909-910.
38. THOMSON, J. D., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. Am. Nat. 118: 443-449.
39. _, AND J. BRUNET. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 11-16.
40. WHALEN, M. D., AND G. J. ANDERSON. 1981. Distribution of gametophytic self-incompatibility and infragenetic classification in Solanum. Taxon 30: 761-767.
41. WILLSON, M. F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 777-790.
42. YAMPOLSKY, C., AND H. YAMPOLSKY. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Genet. 3: 1-62.