Optimization of fill volumes in automated peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages

  Durand, Pierre Yves ^a,c   Balteau, Patrick ^b   Chanliau, Jacques ^a   Kessler, Michèle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

^b Baxter R and D Europe   (Belgium)

^c ALTIR   (France)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Intraperitoneal pressure; Intraperitoneal volume; Peritoneal transport; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; DIALYSATE; DIFFUSION; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEUM; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPINE POSITION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TRANSPORT;

EID: 0034125099     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080002002s16     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Durand PY, Chanliau J, Gambéroni J, Hestin D, Kessler M. APD: Clinical measurement of the maximal acceptable intraperitoneal volume. In: Khanna R, ed. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, 1994; 10:63-7.
2. Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R, Nolph KD, Scalamogna A, Metzler MH, Schneider TW, Prowant BF, Ryan LP. Intraabdominal pressure during natural activities in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 1986; 44:129-35.
3. Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, Struijk DG, Arisz L. Differences in the peritoneal transport of water, solutes and proteins between dialysis with two-and with three-liter exchanges. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1988; 3:198-204.
4. Keshaviah P, Emerson PF, Vonesh EF, Brandes JC. Relationship between body size, fill volume and mass transfer area coefficient in peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:1820-6.
5. Rippe B, Stelin G. Simulations of peritoneal solute transport during CAPD. Application of two-pore formalism. Kidney Int 1989; 35:1234-44.
6. Imholz ALT, Koomen GCM, Struijk DG, Arisz L, Krediet RT. Effect of an increased intraperitoneal pressure on fluid and solute transport during CAPD. Kidney Int 1993; 44:1078-85.
7. Durand PY, Chanliau J, Gambéroni J, Hestin D, Kessler M. Intraperitoneal pressure, peritoneal permeability and volume of ultrafiltration in CAPD. In: Khanna R, Nolph KD, Prowant BF, Twardowski ZJ, Oreopoulos DG, eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1992; 8:22-5.
8. Brandes JC, Packard WJ, Watters SK, Fritsche C. Optimization of dialysate flow and mass transfer during automated peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 25:603-10.
9. Wang T, Heimbürger O, Cheng HH, Waniewski J, Bergström J, Lindholm B. Effect of increased dialysate fill volume on peritoneal fluid and solute transport. Kidney Int 1997; 52:1068-76.
10. Flessner MF, Schwab A. Pressure threshold for fluid loss from the peritoneal cavity. Am J Physiol 1996; 270:F377-90.
11. Durand PY, Chanliau J, Gambéroni J, Hestin D, Kessler M. Hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure and volume of ultrafiltration in CAPD. In: Khanna R, Nolph KD, Prowant BF, Twardowski ZJ, Oreopoulos DG, eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, 1993; 9:46-8.
12. Krediet RT, Douma CE, Van Olden RW, Ho-Dac-Pannekeet MM, Struijk DG. Augmenting solute clearance in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1998; 54:2218-25.
13. Fischbach M, Terzic J, Dangelser C, Schneider P, Roger ML, Geisert J. Improved dialysis dose by optimizing intraperitoneal volume prescription thanks to intraperitoneal pressure measurements in children. In: Khanna R, ed. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, 1997; 13:271-3.
14. Amici G, Thomaseth K. Role of drain and fill profile in automated peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol 1999; 129:44-53.
15. Durand PY, Balteau P, Chanliau J, Kessler M. Analysis of the drain flow rates in supine position measured by continuous data acquisition [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18(Suppl 2):S1.
16. Wadhwa NK, Seliger M, Greenberg HE, Bergofsky E, Mendelson WB. Sleep related disorders in end-stage renal disease patients on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1992; 12:51-6.
17. Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nolph KD, Martinez AJ, Lampton LM. High volume, low frequency continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1983; 23: 64-70.
18. Durand PY, Chanliau J, Gambéroni J, Hestin D, Kessler M. Routine measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure. In: Khanna R, Nolph KD, Prowant BF, Twardowski ZJ, Oreopoulos DG, eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 1992; 8:108-12.
19. Durand PY, Balteau P, Chanliau J, Kessler M. Continuous data acquisition in peritoneal dialysis: Method, importance and preliminary results [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18(Suppl 2):S80.
20. Fischbach M, Desprez P, Donnars F, Geisert J. Hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure in children on peritoneal dialysis: Practical implications. A 18-month clinical experience. In: Khanna R, ed. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, 1994; 10:294-6.
21. Freida P, Issad B, Allouache M. Relationships between fill volume, small solute clearances and net ultrafiltration during a standardized APD program [Abstract]. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18(Supp 2):S2.
22. Kumano K, Yamashita A, Sakai T. Optimal number of dialysate exchanges in automated peritoneal dialysis. In: Khanna R, Nolph KD, Prowant BF, Twardowski ZJ, Oreopoulos DG, eds. Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Toronto: Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, 1993; 9:110-13.